350 Warrior vs. 350 Raptor
#41
350 Warrior vs. 350 Raptor
Originally posted by: ss97
My father runs a Scrambler 500, and his speedo says he tops out at about 60, and on the open road I start to gain on him at top speed. Not much but just enough to know that you are going about 2mph faster..
My father runs a Scrambler 500, and his speedo says he tops out at about 60, and on the open road I start to gain on him at top speed. Not much but just enough to know that you are going about 2mph faster..
ur dads scrammy only hits 60? most are known to do mid 60's...
#42
#43
#44
350 Warrior vs. 350 Raptor
Originally posted by: paulith
wow! i am surprized that a kfx beat you... the last time i rode with my friend who has a 04 kfx we where dead even the whole 1/4 mile...all i had was my exhaust and jet kit
wow! i am surprized that a kfx beat you... the last time i rode with my friend who has a 04 kfx we where dead even the whole 1/4 mile...all i had was my exhaust and jet kit
#45
350 Warrior vs. 350 Raptor
the only difference between the warrior and the raptor 350 is the new look, headlights, suspensions, stock tires, and the exhaust system. O eyah, and they shaved off about 20 lbs.. wow.. what a difference... anyway, I love my warrior, and it doesn't even have any mods. So, its personal preference.
Of course, if u have teh cash, get the raptor 350, who wouldn't? Its the modified version of the warrior.
The raptor 350 has the same reliable 350 engine. The warrior also has teh reputation of being one of the most duable racing quads available. So, its ur choise. This was my 2 cents. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/img]
Of course, if u have teh cash, get the raptor 350, who wouldn't? Its the modified version of the warrior.
The raptor 350 has the same reliable 350 engine. The warrior also has teh reputation of being one of the most duable racing quads available. So, its ur choise. This was my 2 cents. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/img]
#46
#47
350 Warrior vs. 350 Raptor
Use a stopwatch, and run your bike at top speed past a start point and then a finish line that you measure off at 1/4 mile. Get someone to start the stopwatch when you pass the start line and stop the watch when you cross the finish line and do the math.
This is one sure fire way to get actuall speeds without using radar, or speedometers!
This is a simple direct way to get real speed. At least the average speed at a cheap price! If you can hold a constant speed on the level, this will give you a very accurate number.
Afterall, physics says velocity is distance vs time, so that is exactly what you are doing. Measuring time vs distance in reality. Can't get much better than that, and hey NASCAR and the racing industry has been using this method forever at tracks.
This is one sure fire way to get actuall speeds without using radar, or speedometers!
This is a simple direct way to get real speed. At least the average speed at a cheap price! If you can hold a constant speed on the level, this will give you a very accurate number.
Afterall, physics says velocity is distance vs time, so that is exactly what you are doing. Measuring time vs distance in reality. Can't get much better than that, and hey NASCAR and the racing industry has been using this method forever at tracks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)