CAN-AM (BRP) Discussions about CAN-AM ATVs.

looking for info about CT pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2001 | 10:53 AM
  #11  
CALDS650's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
Default



<< Hey CalDS650, Tell us about those TCS shocks again. Do you sit a little lower than stock? I have the Works steelers which are easily converted to TCS. I think the TCS rebuild adding rezzies is about $500.
.....Now I know the stock (Arvin RydeFX) front shocks really suck, and the works shocks were a huge improvement, but I would like to see a little more &quot;race sag&quot;, especially in the front, where I have resprung it anyway using the stock springs plus one of the works &quot;helper&quot; springs. It is softer and saggier than the works setup was, but I want more. Due to cost, about $500 to rebuild the works front shocks, I will probably do just that and wait on the rear shock rebuild. What do you think? I haven't talked myself into this quite yet. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
>>



Hi fourlix sorry it took so long to get back to you but I had to test them out this weekend. The TCS I have are are set up for the desert and dunes and due not lower the DS650 any. They are great in the whops The faster I went the better they work.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2001 | 01:05 PM
  #12  
Joey9's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Vegas 650?
Are you saying that you lost top-end power with the pipe and jet kit?
Or that the pipe added power and when the jet kit was installed
it took a .5HP off the top? Is that the DJ kit with no airbox and just the K&amp;N bolted to the carb? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks

Joe
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2001 | 09:43 PM
  #13  
VEGAS650's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Default

Here's the scoop on the CT. The bluing is on the whole header and pipe up to the canister. it is ugly. It is chrome or stainless, I don't know. IT IS NOT CERAMIC. As far as the performance. I gave Dynojet my DS with the pipe on and the airbox removed. I have the direct K&amp;N attached to the carb. They made me bring the stock exhaust but not the airbox. First they took off the CT and put the stock pipe back on, with the K&amp;N on. Then they made a jet kit for it and I assume they left that in when they re-tested with the CT on, cause they had to give me one as part of the deal for letting them use it. Yes, THEY said it lost a little on the top I assume with thier jet kit. CT claims it makes power over the whole band. I know I could FEEL the difference on the bottom but it was very hard to notice anything on the top.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2001 | 01:22 AM
  #14  
Knutz's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Default

What Dynojet told you goes along with what I have found about several exhausts I tested. Many of them showed good gains on the bottom and/or mid, but actually lost power from the stock exhaust on the top end. Some others gained up top, but gave up power in the mid to bottom area. I don't want to get into bashing, so please don't ask what exhausts did poorly. My recomendations, after my dyno testing, are the Custom X for a slip on or the Big Gun for a full system.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
buddieboy
Chinese Quads
4
Dec 9, 2016 05:50 PM
mrtidy
Polaris Ask an Expert! In fond memory of Old Polaris Tech.
9
Feb 3, 2016 05:00 PM
exmotocrosser
Polaris
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:18 AM
woodthings
Chinese Quads
4
Sep 25, 2015 05:58 PM
Todd C Wadas
2) Chassis problems..
0
Sep 23, 2015 11:31 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 PM.