The did ruin the look of the Scrammy. They should have kept the sportier looking plastic. At least they finally did give it a decent front suspension.

 

I find there really getting cheap on the front bush guards and fender flares. The old grizzly looked like it could mow through and down brush compared to the new ones.



Some ATVs like this Outlander did not even attempt to put a front protection on or even place to attach a tow cable.
Where we ride that ATV would be lucky to have lights after a few trail rides.



Big Bear in comparison

 

yep- unless you get the XT package which give you the front bumper- there's no tow point on the front end of any can-am 4x4. A lot of people attach a cable to the horizontal aluminum bar just under the grill and end up tearing off their front plastic!

to be honest- I don't see many outlanders out there without the xt package or front bumper- but still, a sturdy front tow point is desirable.

 

I want to see one of the new Scramblers in person. Pictures don't always bring out the best in looks. At least not any pictures I've seen taken of me.

 

It does look like a pug!

 

I've always heard the camera adds 10 pounds. So how many cameras were they using on you?

(he asks from a safe distance)

 

scoot?

did you forget how old moose is?
you meant to ask "how many birds were used?"




*Disclaimer* no birds were harmed in the writing of this post.




-

 

That's not what I read.

 

Holy cow that scrambler is ugly!! What are they thinking? Jeez. I don't follow the wisdom of skimping on front protection in a machine that is specifically designed to be used in all types of terrains. Wonder if its a weight saving deal?

 

Most of the trimming is for weight savings to increase the power to weight ratio. One of the reasons the Pre-2012 Can-Ams had such a great ratio is the weight compared to a Polaris. Frames were a tad on the light side in my mind. I'd love to see the Polaris frame with the Can-Am Rotax engine.