Who needs damn reverse on a sport quad? common now guys is that all you got on the ex?

 

dude..some people ride their quads in tight trails and get in binds from time to time where its nice to have it.i dont have reverse but i would like it.y would you get a less powerful,air cooled,anti-reverse quad when you can get the more powerful,liquid cooled,reversed quad for near the same price.was the same in the beginning

 

Cause it is more relaible and air cooled has not hurt my machine once yet buddy, and i would not be talking you ride a 89 piece!

 

no they are also slow j/k

 

i have a 400ex and i wouldn't trade it for a Z400 if my life depended on it. i could care less bout reverse. its so easy to pull a quad backwards. don't even tell me your to weak to pull a under 400Ib quad back.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img]

 

but why do it if you can get a quad with reverse and more power for the same money

 

Well if you could read mick i said its more reliable! But i dont know if your old enough to read let alone say somthing intelegent on here.

 

its not hard to be reliable when you are slow

 

i like everything about my EX better than the Z. it handles better, suspension is set up for more agressive ridin, i luv the wayu 400ex's look, the honda is higher quality, i no i can beat the sh*t outta my 400ex and it won't let me down or leave me stranded. and the 400ex feels like it has a better balance point in a wheelie and has more bottom end push to get it up. and i noticed the Z400 was a lil more hesitant to get up and go untill revs get up. and liquid cooling can fail and fry a topend. JMO but i think the 400ex is one of the greatest accoplishments ever made in the ATV world.. the sad part is suzuki has 4 years to make a better quad and it jump barly gets by as being considered "better" than a 400ex.

 

he could probably smoke your 400ex piecer