Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

05 rancher at vs. rubicon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #1  
mlmwr0203's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

I am looking to buy an atv. I will be mainly using it for slow speed operations, like pulling deer and planting food plots. I'm stuck on trying to figure out if I need a liquid cooled motor or will an air cooled motor be enough. Anyone with any good advice please respond. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 09:27 PM
  #2  
LittleBill's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

do not buy a rancher at for working and hauling, the low end torque is quite bad, either go the 350 rancher, or forman or rubi, the at i ride with can't pull people out of mud, it just bogs and doesn't turn the wheels, the 350 i have has tons more torque. ur decision
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 05:35 AM
  #3  
nike's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

the foreman 500 is the best for work. and air cooled honda dont overheat near as often as that liquid cooled popo. unless the bike runs all day long i dont think there is a need for liquid cooled and i live in texas!
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #4  
reconranger's Avatar
Red Rider
Honda, accept nothing less!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 1
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

I notice that your two choices are both automatics. I am a gear-on-gear manual transmission guy. Why have an overly complex (and expensive) automatic when it just isn't necessary? In terms of simplicity, durability, and longevity, you are just way ahead with a manual.

Are you insisting on an automatic? At low speed, it's not like you are going to have to be shifting often anyway. Like they said, check out the Rancher 350 ($1,000 less than the AT!), or the Foreman 500 if you need more power ($900 cheaper than the Rubicon).
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #5  
mlmwr0203's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

Thank you all for the good advice. After thinking about it again, I realized that the rancher 350 es would be a good all around atv. I really don't need 4 wheel drive, if I ever did decide to upgrade, I could put a winch on the front. Thinking about where I hunt, there isn't many places I could get stuck and not be able to pull myself out. Thanks again for your advice. I planning on visiting southern honda in Tennessee-$3300 otd for a brand new rancher es.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #6  
yoda's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

Buddy, Buy the Ruby. Smooth tranny, auto or shift. 2wheel OR 4wheel drive IF YOU EVER NEED IT (You may need it while planting food plots). From what I read a fairly smooth ride. The ride alone is worth getting the Ruby. Trust me, the rancher suspension is rough.


Sorry Reconranger, I know you like the standard shift, but I had to go with the Ruby.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2005 | 11:29 PM
  #7  
paintballbanshee's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

i love my buddies rubi, slow top speed (who needs it though) and has so much torque its great
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 01:02 AM
  #8  
LittleBill's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

get the 350 but get the 4x4, if u ride in snow its almost a necassity, especially if pulling something
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 08:54 AM
  #9  
PETE16's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

Paintballbanshee!

I don't think the 05 Ruby's have a slow top speed! I've had mine up to 59mph's isn't that fast enough for a utility machine? what do you consider fast?
 
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 09:55 AM
  #10  
reconranger's Avatar
Red Rider
Honda, accept nothing less!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 1
Default 05 rancher at vs. rubicon

I have both a Rancher 350 2X4 and 4X4. The 2wd is a sweet little machine! Very sporty for a ute. It will do amazing things, that you wouldn't expect a 2wd to be able to do! I go rock crawling with my friends on their big (heavy!) 4X4's, and they say I make it look easy.

But, there are times when you just need a 4X4, like when there is snow and mud (not a lot of snow in Georgia I guess) or the rocks are just to huge, so consider getting the 4X4. It may turn out to be money well spent.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Johnny Mac
Honda
5
Aug 15, 2019 03:13 PM
Clint Russell
Honda
10
Sep 25, 2015 03:20 PM
patrick.oc123
Honda
2
Sep 16, 2015 03:45 AM
patrick.oc123
General Chat
0
Sep 15, 2015 02:45 PM
Ridgerunner665
Honda
8
Sep 15, 2015 01:20 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.