Does anybody know which is faster between the Bayou 220 and the Recon?

 

Scott,

Based on what I know as a Bayou 220 owner who has read numerous posts on the Recon, I would say the Recon is not only faster but also has a firmer ride. I should also add that I have seen numerous posts from younger riders who want more speed from their 220. However, it is an excellent choice for those who have "no need for speed" and enjoy a more leisurely ride.

David

[This message has been edited by drlaney (edited 10-01-1999).]

 

Ive ridden both. I have a 98 Bayou 220 and my friend has a 98 Recon. His vibrates a lot but it has better handling and a little more speed. Mine is more comfortable and i like it just as much. And I did pay $600 less than he did.

 

How about the Yamaha BearTracker? How does it compare to the Bayou 220?

 

Scott,

The Yamaha Beartraker is basically an improved version of the Timberwolf. The Timberwolf was known for being underpowered so Yamaha decided to change the carb and engine design to increase performance. I have not read any posts from new Beartraker owners on how it performs.

 

Who cares about speed? If you want speed, get a Corvette! The measure of an ATV (All Terrain vehicle) is where it can take you. I'm not that familiar with a Honda Recon, but the 220 Bayou is pretty good for a two-wheel drive at getting you over some challenging stuff.

You know, maybe there is another measure for an ATV? Which one is the most fun for you?

[This message has been edited by kclayd (edited 10-03-1999).]

 

My daughter has a 1988 220 bayou and i have a 99 Recon. They are very similar in performance including speed. However as she is 70lbs lighter than i am she has a bit more top end . about 44-45 mph vs. 42 mph for the Honda. Mine pulls better before top end as the gearing is lower. Both are a pleasure to drive on the trails.
Kevin

 

GO WITH THE HONDA...IT'S JUST A ALL AROUND BETTER MACHINE FROM WHAT I HAVE READ AND HEAR...