Is the mojave?...
#4
#6
the blaster SUCKS there is no way that it is better!They are slower,not as reliable and never seem to work right!mojaves nevere break down!i have had a blaster and mojave ,and the blaster made me walk home4 times!the mojave has nevere missed a beat[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
#7
the blasters engine was designed in 1978 hows that it is air cooled no reverse have fun replacing the rings every year
and what about the blasters bad oil injectors they fail constantly and blow up engines
as for the mojave the engine may have been designed in 1987 but four strokes are just now up to its standards liquid cooled dohc four valve
these things are found on todays awsome engines like th crf 450 and the yzf 426 only the mo is on a smaller scale as for the mo's suspension it only seems harsh for casual and slow riders such as yourself on large jumps and hi speeds it needs to b ''stiff'' so it will not bottem out very easy the brakes also kill the blasters notoriosly terrible back brakes
and what about the blasters bad oil injectors they fail constantly and blow up engines
as for the mojave the engine may have been designed in 1987 but four strokes are just now up to its standards liquid cooled dohc four valve
these things are found on todays awsome engines like th crf 450 and the yzf 426 only the mo is on a smaller scale as for the mo's suspension it only seems harsh for casual and slow riders such as yourself on large jumps and hi speeds it needs to b ''stiff'' so it will not bottem out very easy the brakes also kill the blasters notoriosly terrible back brakes