Churchill = smart guy

The only thing with that which confuses me is why those who label themselves either way later in life (you know after gaining enough experience to really understand what the stupid labels mean anyhow) can not appreciate the better points of the different thinkings of their counterparts.

What I mean by this is the importance of having values for society and a solid foundation based on true substance (like family etc) while still being able to support an individuals rights to outside the mainstream etc.


Now as far as this (yet another conspiricy theory lol) is concerned I think there have been much better ones in the past. Those who have read some of my stuff here before should know I dont discount any of these completely unless there is some substance to back up the idea that its just nonsense or propaganda, and this one is closer to being dropped than many others.

Though I wouldnt put it past our govt to lose a few thousand innocents in order to protect national security or to fullfill another similar important program etc some of these theories just dont seem to make any sense as the end result was not needed to accomplish anything obvious etc.

Read that to mean that you have to be more than a little paranoid or suspicious (or maybe more) to believe the us govt was behind or orchastrating the events of 911, and totally in denial if you believe they had no clue as to what was happening at all.

There are so many believable reports of various scenerios that provide reasonable evidence that at least some people here knew something was going to happen (these include many not reporting to work, money trails supporting the purps, and various intel reports surrounding the purps movements into the us and the many foreign intel groups tailing them etc etc).

I cant figure the exact reasons all this happened and why or if those who had any knowledge didnt act on it etc, or what if any larger purpose may have been involved, but what I do know is that there are more than a few issues involved that just dont add up and leave real reason for questioning.

Still this vid and info doesnt seem to make a point to me.

 

Are you stating that reporting a building fall before it happens is not suspicious? What then would be? Maybe if a plane was to have reported to to have crashed before it did[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]

 

440 - you are too long winded and I'm not going to take the time to read an entire page of your rantings. I do find it funny that you are so far to the left, yet want the state to pay for a place for you to ride.


sqeege - I am stating that the building behind the reporters head is not one on the two trade center buildings that came down on 9/11.

 

Sorry to bring this thread back from the dead, but WTF do you mean "so far to the left"?

Or for the state to pay for my place to ride?

Maybe you need to take the time to read what I have said so that your comments make any sense at all.

I dont mean this as harshly as it reads, but seriously I think you would have commented differently if you read thru and understood my comments, and you deffinately wouldnt have associated them with the left, or even the right [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] as just like the rest of us poor working slobs (all of us earning under 500,000. annual) were seriously stuck in the middle supporting both ends with no end in sight.

Whew

 

My god.......why do you guys just keep beating a dead horse? Has anyone changed their political opinion in this entire thread? Nope. Simple fact is their are liars and cheats in the democratic, republican, ect. parties and everyone is going to find some kind of BS information to back up their claim(s). If you back the entire lineup in any party your credibility has to come into question. Anything other than a respectable conversation and this thread goes in the can.

 

Well said!!