Sportsman 800 vs. Brute Force 750
#11
Sportsman 800 vs. Brute Force 750
Originally posted by: BigBaller
I gota Q? Do all the wheels continue to spinn after they stop slipping?
I gota Q? Do all the wheels continue to spinn after they stop slipping?
#13
Sportsman 800 vs. Brute Force 750
Once the system senses the rear wheels having traction again, it disengages the front wheels for the lighter and easier steering. But, as long as the AWD switch is still on, once the rear wheels slip again, the fronts will engage almost instantly. Even though the initial 4wd engagement is almost seemsless
#15
Sportsman 800 vs. Brute Force 750
Originally posted by: BigBadScrambler
Once the system senses the rear wheels having traction again, it disengages the front wheels for the lighter and easier steering. But, as long as the AWD switch is still on, once the rear wheels slip again, the fronts will engage almost instantly. Even though the initial 4wd engagement is almost seemsless
Once the system senses the rear wheels having traction again, it disengages the front wheels for the lighter and easier steering. But, as long as the AWD switch is still on, once the rear wheels slip again, the fronts will engage almost instantly. Even though the initial 4wd engagement is almost seemsless
It is so seemless that I didn't realize it worked that way until I read about it.
#16
#19
Sportsman 800 vs. Brute Force 750
The 4WD system on Polaris's might be Ok going up slippery hills because of the rear tires spinning thus engaging the front wheels. But what about going down a muddy or snow covered hill on a Polaris. AHHHHHHHH! how does the Polaris AWD work then??????? NOT TOO GOOD! On a Polaris you go down hills in 2WD even when it is supposed to be in 4WD. The rear wheels arn't spinning so its in 2WD. The Brute Force's system is either in 4WD or out. Which ever you choose. Not the sometimes in, sometimes out wishy, washy Polaris system. Enough said!