Polaris Discussions about Polaris ATVs.

What is the technical difference between a SP500 HO engine and a common engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 06:01 PM
  #1  
Svalbard11's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Default

What is the technical difference between a SP500 HO engine and a common engine?
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 06:12 PM
  #2  
AlkyBurninX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,850
Likes: 0
Default

Basically a higher lift cam and higher compression piston. I think they might have put in larger intake valves, but don't hold me to it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 11:23 PM
  #3  
weedy's Avatar
'5 minutes worth of planning equals 30 minutes of execution'
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Higher lift cam, bigger carb = 20% MORE POWER
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 02:24 AM
  #4  
Svalbard11's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Default

Sorry for my poor english. Can anyone describe whats a "higher lift cam" ? Dont get it. In case I buy a 6X6, is there a way to mod the engine up to a HO engine?

Martin
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 03:39 AM
  #5  
Mr350X's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
Default

The camshaft opens the valves.
A "higher lift cam" has bigger cam lobes which opens the valves more, and more air/fuel is sucked in.

Camshaft "Duration" is the length of time the valve is held open.

Usually higher lift also means more duration to go with it.
(valves open MORE, and stay open longer)

hope I helped. -Matt
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
Farmr123's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Default

I would like to add another thing.
When Polaris upped the horsepower, they also strengthened the crankshaft, and the point where the crankshaft bearings attatch to the side cases. Making a non-HO into a HO risks overloading the crank, or side cases if you pull it hard a lot.

Farmr
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 12:29 PM
  #7  
HomerS's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default

Basically the HO makes 20% more power than the non HO in the higher rpm ranges. From what I have read, to do this it actually sacrifices some low rpm torque. I agree with Greg Sims in the other post - for this type of work the non HO engine is probably superior. In any case, it is not at a disadvantage.

The problem here appears to be traction due to lack of machine weight. The Sportsman 6X6 or Ranger would appear to be better choices.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hugemoth
Chinese Quads
10
Jul 20, 2020 03:28 AM
KimSJoh
Polaris Ask an Expert! In fond memory of Old Polaris Tech.
14
Jul 18, 2015 07:20 PM
coolguy420
General Chat
2
Jul 10, 2015 01:17 AM
cornermike
Polaris
1
Jul 8, 2015 11:44 PM
bikedad3
Suzuki
2
Jul 2, 2015 02:15 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 PM.