Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

which is better?

Old Jul 14, 2004 | 06:04 PM
  #31  
atvcrazyone2's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

it does not matter the blaster is the best for them all
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 06:15 PM
  #32  
CHEWBACCA's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

the blaster doesn't have the handeling the Z250 does. Plus, some people prefer the driveshaft oer chain
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #33  
atvcrazyone2's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

who? no one I know does and if they do they are way behind me LOL
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #34  
atvcrazyone2's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

you say yourselfe that a z250 is too slow
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #35  
atvcrazyone2's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

the only quad that is any good with a shaft drive is a kawasaki v force 700 but i still think it should be chain
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #36  
MBrooks420's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

They aren't comparable. The Z-250 is a entry level atv beginers atv. The Blaster is an slightly more advanced bike, that has a lot of potential for modification, and set up properly can do well on a track. It is no frills, or creature comforts of the Z.
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 09:57 PM
  #37  
DeShawn's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

The Blaster is more set up for modification and racing. The Z is a quad more for beginers with beginer like features, but can also be ridden by anyone. And can keep up with the Mojave,250ex, and Blaster.
 
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM.