Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

Need input on Suzuki 160

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-07-2002, 09:24 PM
DEPALMA's Avatar
Range Rover
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need input on Suzuki 160

My nehew is ready to move out of his 90 does anybody have any input about the 160? Before anybody suggest all 250's are to big he is ony 9. Thanks for the input[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
  #2  
Old 12-07-2002, 10:02 PM
shotguncreek's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need input on Suzuki 160

The Suzuki LT160 is really not that bad a quad and the size is right for smaller riders. I have owned one since 1989 and NOTHING has ever gone wrong with it, NOTHING (I did replace tires, a chain, and sprockets). The suspension travel isn't the greatest . The only trouble with a 160 is that there are better, more modern quads for not much more money. I have owned a Kawaski 220, a Honda Recon, and a Honda Rancher. The Recon was a vast improvement over the 160, the Kawasaki 220 not so much of an improvement. The Rancher is in a different class altogether and although I like it alot, I miss the Recon for it's light handling. Still have the Suzuki 160 and my nephew rides it, I ride it, can't say anything bad about it. Understand that the new Suzuki 250 Ozark is a very good quad also but have not riden one.
 
  #3  
Old 12-07-2002, 11:02 PM
Mr45auto's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need input on Suzuki 160

We had an LT160 for about a year. It is not something I'd reccomend for a 2nd machine. A first quad to learn on okay but not a step up. At least go to a Recon. I'd avoid the LT160 as agressive riding will get him hurt. The suspension is terrible and the quad just doesnt handle well at all. It was totally reliable with NO problems whatsoever but the tires are miserable, the suspension almost non existant and the motor had barely more power than an 80.
 
  #4  
Old 12-10-2002, 04:48 PM
smallquads's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need input on Suzuki 160

I have a 160 as well as a bayou 220. I find the kids are spending less and less time riding the 160 now that they are used to riding. It was a great quad to learn on, but now they are looking for more.

mine will most likely go up for sale this spring.

just my .02 worth

Stan (smallquads)
 
  #5  
Old 12-10-2002, 06:22 PM
wille1's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Need input on Suzuki 160

my brother had a 2000 160 and he beat it bad that baby just kept on running. the new one don't come with racks like the older ones do. it is a real dependable quad. for a nine year old its maybe a little big my 9 year old had a older yfm 100 yamaha. but he rode my brothers 160 alot. there are fine in water and it was ok in the mud because you could just through it around real easy. I would also look at the yamaha breeze 125, or the new 200 rally by bombadier. it an auto as well. where the 160 is a manual. but either way if there well taken care of they are all pretty good quads.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joe454
Arctic Cat
7
11-20-2020 01:19 PM
shimanok2
Buying an ATV
94
01-29-2016 07:37 PM
Hack714
Introduce Yourself
6
10-06-2015 06:51 AM
Hack714
General Chat
2
09-26-2015 08:11 AM
Hack714
Buying an ATV
11
09-20-2015 05:54 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Need input on Suzuki 160



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 PM.