Why didn't yamaha put the tri z motor in a quad?
#1
#3
Why didn't yamaha put the tri z motor in a quad?
Originally posted by: BLASTERDEVIL2
from what i've heard it's the worst of all the three wheelers.
from what i've heard it's the worst of all the three wheelers.
WO! WO !! WO!! that is WAY WAY wrong!!!
The Tri-Z had the MOST stock HP out of all three. I stil have an original title that has "h.p. 33.9" on it. The only reason why the Honda and Kawai wher faster was because they had 6 speeds and the Yamaha had 5. But from 0-60 the Tri-Z is KING!!
Bigger.
#5
Why didn't yamaha put the tri z motor in a quad?
NO problem,
I never could understand why the Yamaha tri-Z never got any respect. They actually had alot of neat features.(rear gas tank/w fuel pump, spring loaded shifter,and rear-brake peddle)
I have seen lots of Blasters with the Tri-Z engine in them and they SCREAM!!!
Bigger.
I never could understand why the Yamaha tri-Z never got any respect. They actually had alot of neat features.(rear gas tank/w fuel pump, spring loaded shifter,and rear-brake peddle)
I have seen lots of Blasters with the Tri-Z engine in them and they SCREAM!!!
Bigger.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DTroyer01
Buying an ATV
5
07-03-2015 07:34 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)