2002 Blaster, 2000 Warrior, 2002 Lakota, or 2002 400 EX?
#21
#22
2002 Blaster, 2000 Warrior, 2002 Lakota, or 2002 400 EX?
Warrior is a good quad but its just so heavy! if yamaha made them lighter they'd be loads better. And also the handling isn't that great. overall i'd go with the lakota just because its small manuvers easy and has decent power. Blasters aren't good trail rideing unless your a good rider.
#23
2002 Blaster, 2000 Warrior, 2002 Lakota, or 2002 400 EX?
I'd take the Warrior over the 400EX any day because it's cheaper and has reverse and you'll get tired of the power on both of them in a short time anyway most likely. Then you'll be spending more money on one that's got some power. Or at least this is what has happened to me.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)