Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

2002 Blaster, 2000 Warrior, 2002 Lakota, or 2002 400 EX?

Old Aug 6, 2003 | 11:07 PM
  #21  
StockRappy's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default 2002 Blaster, 2000 Warrior, 2002 Lakota, or 2002 400 EX?

the 400ex can do about 64 stock .
i swear to god if u mean mph u should be shot...
this will probably be the only time in my life ill ever say this but, go with the 400ex....
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 11:12 PM
  #22  
blindside350's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Default 2002 Blaster, 2000 Warrior, 2002 Lakota, or 2002 400 EX?

Warrior is a good quad but its just so heavy! if yamaha made them lighter they'd be loads better. And also the handling isn't that great. overall i'd go with the lakota just because its small manuvers easy and has decent power. Blasters aren't good trail rideing unless your a good rider.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2003 | 11:19 PM
  #23  
TrailBreaker70's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Default 2002 Blaster, 2000 Warrior, 2002 Lakota, or 2002 400 EX?

I'd take the Warrior over the 400EX any day because it's cheaper and has reverse and you'll get tired of the power on both of them in a short time anyway most likely. Then you'll be spending more money on one that's got some power. Or at least this is what has happened to me.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95wolv
Honda
7
Sep 27, 2024 12:00 PM
Scooter's Shop
Polaris
9
Oct 9, 2015 02:09 PM
nastyblaster100
General Chat
2
Sep 13, 2015 01:19 PM
chewy78
Polaris
1
Sep 8, 2015 10:37 AM
byronman
Polaris
2
Sep 6, 2015 06:34 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.