Wich on is faster of the two... wich one has better bottom end... and better on top end?

 

I own an 01 Warrior with very little mods. (See my profile) I smoke my buddies Blaster consitstantly. His bike has a few mods. He rebuilt the top half of the motor. If at a dead stop, I'll start in second gear, smoke him off line, and never look back. His machine just can't catch up.

 

warriors suck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i have an 04 blaster w/ a b1 toomey pipe and i have beat every thing i pulled next to besides a z400 that my dad has!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

warriors suck!!!!!!!!!!! your friend must not be able to ride worth a crap!!![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

the blaster is alot faster with mods, but the warrior is faster stock. 04masterblaster, your blaster isn't that fast buddy. but i agree with you that warriors aren't all that good.

 

I've had both. The warrior has more bottom end, midrange, and top end power and speed. My blaster had a FMF gold series pipe, roost boost, reeds, air filter. My warrior was basically stock, but it still was faster than my modded blaster.

 

I've beaten several blasters.......old topic...do a search before posting this kindve of thread.

 

hmm..u suck blasters are a little girls bike, they are like the size of my left nut..for all you blaster riders, come on get a 400 u women!

 

warrior's r good but i mena this topic has been brought up alot...

 

for real blasters are for smaller teenagers, but most ppl can't afford a 400. the blaster is a great begginer fourwheeler and can be alotta fun to do stupid sh*t on.
LMFAO!!!!