if you are deciding on a warrior or blaster get a warrior plz.. hahaha im just saying they are small..

 

sounds to me like youre insulting yourself there man. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

hahahaha i am being sarcastic there turbo..hahaha

 

stock for stock the warrior is faster. put a pipe on the blaster and it will pull away from the starting line. It will pull away quicker with stock gearing but it will still beat a warrior with a 14 tooth front sprocket up front. Mine did anyway. Put a pipe on a warrior and it will be about even with a piped blaster. The blaster gains so much with the toomey pipe. Probably five horses anyway.

 

IVE ALWAYS SAID,,,,,,IF YOU WANT A MIDGET BIKE GO WITH A BLASTER,,,,,,,TAKES A SMALL SHORT LEGGED PERSON TO FIT ON ONE OF THEM THINGS AND BE COMFORTABLE.....THATS MY 2 CENTS

 

A warrior is gonna have way less maintence then a blaster.My brother owns a 93 and is still runs like a dream and he does no maintence on it all there known to be very reliable.

 

aparently u haven't pulled up to the line with very fu*king much! GO WARRIORS

 

not everyone can afford a bigger bike... and i wouldnt be callin us women there bud... its not all about the bike ur usin in a race... rider skill has alot to do with it... jus because u have a bigger bike doesnt always mean ur gonna win.

 

besides sn0w, youre a little general about your remark there, dont forget my 350 will kick your 400's a$$.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

(and of course I gotta back up Zblaster there too, hes got a point)

 

the warrior will havve more of everthing. top,middle and bottom