Well ill tell ya i have owned a warrior and it was a great quad. I own a Kodiak and it is a great quad. BUT they are really so diffrent to be comparing them seems silly. To Be totaly honest to get the best features of both i would recomend you get a Wloverine and not worry about the full time 4x4. The only time you will really notice it is if you are trying to do cookies. Is there some reason you dont want full time 4x4 ????
I use to think the selectability on my Grizz and Kodiak was a great feature but as i spend more and more time on them i dont really see the point.

 

Hey dave, i was thinking about either the grizz or kodiak, do you feel the kodiak is underpowered in real life situations on the trail? How else does it compare to the grizz?
Thanks,

 

I used to own a new 1999 Grizzly and had too many problems to mention. Finally got rid of it a month ago. I'm now the proud owner of a 400EX. I've driven the Warrior (owner of an ATV/Dirt bike shop) its gutless, so that leaves the Kodiak. I've read that its just as quick off the line as the Grizzly (not saying much) only not quite as fast, and handles better (it can't handle any worse). Good Luck with whatever you end up buying.

 

I to think you should get the Wolverine it is a perfect mix between the Kodiak and the Warrior. I was going to get a Warrior But then I saw the Wolverine is only 2 mph slower. And the 4x4 makes a huge difference on the trails.

 

Warn industries makes a system so the wolverine can go both 2 wheel drive and 4x4 just a thought