What do you guys think? Which bike is better, a 2004 Warrior or a 2004 Blaster?

 

Depends on what kind of riding you do. The warrior is a little bigger than the blaster.

 

Warrior: Ernie is right what type of riding do you do and how tall are you?

 

I learned to ride on a Blaster, many years ago. After that, I owned a Warrior. It was OK in its day, but frankly Yamaha needs to replace it with something more modern, that will go head to head with the Z400 and 400EX.

Had not ridden a Blaster in years. Rode a friends the other day, and recalled what a BLAST the little bike is to ride!!!

 

i like the blaster better.. there lighter and more fun too me. they are a lil too small tho. and when i hope on one after ridin my banshee it seems more like a toy.. lol. but if it fits u i'd get a blaster. plus they have more potentail than a warrior.

 

Warrior...unless you are racing...then don't get either of them get a KFX400, Z400, or even 400ex

 

i used to own a blaster, it was a fun little quad but i got tired of it after about a month, the suspension was way too stiff, the quad was way too narrow and i would always find my knees hitting the front fenders when i'd make alot of fast turns and the mechanical brakes sucked but dont get me wrong, the blaster is a great starter quad but i would go with the warrior if i had to choose between the 2, the warrior isn't much better than the blaster tho so if i were you i'd save up for a 400ex or maybe a z400, depending on how much money you have, as a matter of fact know a guy that has a 2000 400ex in kinda rough but running shape that he wants t sell for $1,150, PM me ad i'll give you his phone number if you're interested

 

\
i'd buy it today if you were closer