Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-22-2004 | 08:12 PM
waner's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

I was just looking to upgrade and was woundering if anybody has any thoughts on what the best bang for the buck is going to be.
I have curtis sparks pipe, cam, springs, piston (stock bore and 10.75:1 ) and some mild port work. Any help would be appreciated.
 
  #2  
Old 02-22-2004 | 08:42 PM
BigScary's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

I like my fcr's....but I have never tried the edelbrock..........
I got a lot more bottom end with the fcr's over stock....I can lauch in 3rd gear with stock gearing now........
 
  #3  
Old 02-22-2004 | 08:45 PM
SLIM660's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

I would spend the money on the FCR's. The FCR's are more proven than the Edelbrock setup and they should perform better. If you get the FCR's I think you will be more satisfied in the long run ecspecially if you ever upgrade to get more out of your Raptor. I'm sure there are some people who like the Edelbrock but in my opinion once you dial the FCR's in you'll never look back; they are worth the extra money you will spend for them. Slim
 
  #4  
Old 02-22-2004 | 10:22 PM
waner's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

Thanks for the info. I was also woundering what the intake mods were from craycraft and if it would be worth the money to do a 686 at 12:1? I all ready have 10.75:1 but it's stock bore. Need more power alot more I got spanked by a 440EX last weekend and I'm not very happy about it. The rider of the honda weighs 120 and I'm 215lbs. Starting to wounder if I got what I paid for "local porting"!
 
  #5  
Old 02-22-2004 | 10:27 PM
warrior007's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

Those 440's run when they are done right.. and with 120 lb rider.. you gots lots of work to do
 
  #6  
Old 02-22-2004 | 10:34 PM
Ernie660R's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

Anyone can port a head, just where to remove material there is just a hand full. Jerry Craycraft of Craycraft racing is very good, the best I have seen.

FCR's is the only way to go, JMO
 
  #7  
Old 02-22-2004 | 10:42 PM
waner's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

Do you think that craycraft could improve my already ported head, what about the 686 worth the money?[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]
 
  #8  
Old 02-22-2004 | 11:05 PM
FireFly's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

I ran the same setup minus the porting, I've never had 440's come close. Which cam are you running? porting can do great things to an engine, if done right. The weight difference between rider would make a huge difference, but you should have still beat the ex.
 
  #9  
Old 02-22-2004 | 11:12 PM
Yamaha660R's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,378
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

Give me a couple weeks and I'll let you know how the 686 runs. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
  #10  
Old 02-22-2004 | 11:24 PM
waner's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default FCR'S or Edelbrock for Raptor

Sparks cam but don't know if it's mid or topend, builder does'nt seem to remeber either!
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.