I read that link about the break in proccess. It makes some valid points, but I do believe that "Picture is worth a thousand words" section to be faked or manipulated. The reason I think it is false is because there is not one spec of carbon build up on ANY of the piston, not even the top. The only way I can see this to be true, is if they really did do the test, but then cleaned all of the carbon build up off of it, which is the base of their comparison.


I still think this is a highly debateable topic...