I dunno but i had a video of a worked banshee smokin a mustang..

 

Faster Blaster I wasnt talking about you I was talking about RaptorRider619

 

http://mustangworld.com/forums/showt...hreadid=248059
http://www.cardomain.com/id/hnkstang50 before supercharger
and its not my stang im talkin about its my cousins. his is Hankstang50.
his most resent run was a 11.19
and a fox body runs 14.9 stock ask anyone who has one.
im not 5200 feet above sea level you *** tart. i live in jersey... im almost at sea level
redwingsrule05... red wings sux but anyway good for you you have your opinions and i have my facts.... bottles are for babys

 

98-up yes
93-97 would come down to driver ability. The LT1 cars have nearly identical power to weights as the Fox body's.

 

I pretty sure it is 97-up has the LS1, cause we got a Chilton book on those year of camaros and it say the LS1's were in the 97-up and 93-96 are the LT1. But either they are a fast car, but the old 5.0s are pretty quick too for a little 302, and i think the new mustangs with the 4.6s are crap except for the supercharged Cobras.

 

Every mustang made from 1990 up will run 15.00 or under besides the 6 bangers

 

wow, this is getting interesting, 93-97 camaro's ran around a 14.2, stock, i'm 97% sure about that, they weigh in at around 4300lbs, and have something like, 265-285 horse, depending on the year, and some had like, 310-335(97 ss, and some other limited edition packages, through slp, etc.) then the numbers went up from there, the 1999 ZL1 had a 427cid motor, with 680hp, and ran a 9.55 at 144, all the 02 ss ran a 13.5, at however many mph, i'm not sure about that one.
The ford mustang, indeed does run a 14.9. The 302 has a short stroke, and a nice sized bore, so it makes adequate power for its smaller displacement, and can make even more with simple bolt ons. The fox body also weighs in aroun 3470-3500lbs, and is easily reduceable to a few hundred pounds less(3100lbs).
"the bottle" is not just for babies.
Fuel injection works very well, if you can comprehend it
twin screws are not that great(turbochargers are better, especially big ones on big block chevys)
...but what do i know, i'm only a computer diagnostic technician who builds motors on the side

 

Thanks for backing me on the bottle issue. I to like fuel injection but opted for he carb due to lower N02 prices and overall top end.
AS far for his little 11.9 at sea level I can run a 10.24 at 5200 feet so go suck on it, your not impressing anybody here.

 

11.19 not 11.9. and hey its not even my car. and ya youd win the first few times but what happens when your bottle runs out>???? your gona cry to mommy. sorry. im not trying to impress anyone so dont worry, and u aint impressing anyone eaither.

 

I have 2 one with bottle the other with a twin screw and almost twice as much boost. If you ain't trying to impress then shut the f*%$ up.