Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 02-03-2006 | 02:11 AM
RaptorRandy27's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
From: The Great Northwest
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Originally posted by: ToXyTrailRider
yo, how does the 06 YFZ compare to the Rappy 700, i know the 700 doesn't wheelie unexpectedly like its bro the 660, but does the YFZ pop up easily?

Forget the YFZ comparison, thats been hashed out way to many times on here and just starts pissin matches [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img]

Bone stock I found both the 660R and 700 to be pooches IMO but the 700 had a lot more noticable pull thru the gears.

Do these three mods on a 700,
Power Commander III, GYTR filter Kit and one of the popular exhaust systems like the CT, Sparks, Trinity or LTE duals,
down load the map for your mods or better yet have it dyno tuned and your going to need a +4' swingarm if your into dunning, hillshooting or flat dragging. With the above mods you will have a 50 plus HP wheelie machine if tuned well and it will have more punch mod for mod than an equally prepared 660 and that's from the second you hit the throttle untill you bounce her off the rev limiter.
This has been my personal experience as I have owned both the 600R and 700R.

And 135Boom, I'm not looking to get into any long winded pissin match with you on this either. From what I have seen you post your 700 is still bone stock so you have not personally experienced what a modded and well tuned 700R runs like and as far as stock to stock, who leaves their quads bone stock anyway? The least I have ever done is air filter, jetting and a slip on or full pipe on every machine I have ever owned, and I've owned quite a few over the years [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
 
  #12  
Old 02-03-2006 | 03:06 AM
2fun's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Originally posted by: RaptorRandy27
Originally posted by: ToXyTrailRider
yo, how does the 06 YFZ compare to the Rappy 700, i know the 700 doesn't wheelie unexpectedly like its bro the 660, but does the YFZ pop up easily?

Forget the YFZ comparison, thats been hashed out way to many times on here and just starts pissin matches [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img]
WHAT???!!!???
And here I was getting ready for a good fight!! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 
  #13  
Old 02-03-2006 | 04:26 AM
2FAST4U69's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

I recently went riding with a guy that just bought a 700, I got to ride it. It was a real improvement on suspension, but the power wasn't as impressive as everbody says. It was a slight improvement over a 660 stock to stock, but wasn't something that impressed me enough to trade my 660 in for. All I am saying is that I will give it a couple years to see where it goes before I get one. I think I will always keep my 660 though, it has impressed me the most, and I have big plans in the future for it. I do like the 700 though!!!
 
  #14  
Old 02-03-2006 | 12:41 PM
fuzzylogic's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Originally posted by: 135boom It feels like the 660 has more snap right off the bottom, and I think that is due to the FI. Carb will always be more snappy.
what the hell? would you mind explaining your theory on this one? [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]
 
  #15  
Old 02-03-2006 | 12:44 PM
maddog56's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 1
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Are they faster? Sure. Do they handle better? Heck yes. Is the 700 making the 660 obsolete junk? Not at all.

Are many of the new 700 owners just as cocky or more so than 660 owners were back in 00/01? You bet.
 
  #16  
Old 02-03-2006 | 01:40 PM
fuzzylogic's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Originally posted by: maddog56
Are they faster? Sure. Do they handle better? Heck yes. Is the 700 making the 660 obsolete junk? Not at all.
very true indeed. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
  #17  
Old 02-03-2006 | 02:09 PM
enFORCER's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Originally posted by: maddog56
Are they faster? Sure. Do they handle better? Heck yes. Is the 700 making the 660 obsolete junk? Not at all.

Are many of the new 700 owners just as cocky or more so than 660 owners were back in 00/01? You bet.
I agree with all of that as well.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
  #18  
Old 02-03-2006 | 04:26 PM
135boom's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700



"And 135Boom, I'm not looking to get into any long winded pissin match with you on this either. From what I have seen you post your 700 is still bone stock so you have not personally experienced what a modded and well tuned 700R runs like and as far as stock to stock, who leaves their quads bone stock anyway? The least I have ever done is air filter, jetting and a slip on or full pipe on every machine I have ever owned, and I've owned quite a few over the years [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img][/quote]"


Hey man, ther is NO reason to get into a pissing match at all. You stated what you think and what your experiences have been, so did I.....jsut like everyone else I suspect!
I am indeed still stock on the 700, but the mrs. is wanting to do the 3 mods to it soon. SO, no I dont know what the 700 is like personally with those mods. The mods you desribed as the least you have ever done is the same way with me too. You have to understand that the 700 isnt the machine that I ALWAYS am riding, and there for its up to the lady when she wants it modded. I too have owned every yamaha sport quad there is, minus the blaster.

But anyway, I just posted what I experienced on the two (660 and 700) thus far. There WILL be more to report.
 
  #19  
Old 02-03-2006 | 04:32 PM
135boom's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

IMO carbs ALWAYS have more snap right off idle, properly tuned anyway. With a crab you have direct linkage. The exact mila-second you snap the throttle, the slide is opening up. That is not the way of fi. The computer has to think about it still and take calculations. FI, in my experience on street bikes have proven them selves quit well. I love it. But ALL the carbed bikes I have owned have had more snap off idle then a FI bike. FI is smoother. Carbs are "NOW". Especially nice expensive carbs, like a keihin FCR with accel pump and all.
I guess you could look at it in a "non-relative way" and compare your fi to that of a carb you find on a warrior! Thats not what I am getting at though!!
If you look at pretty much all the big time race cars, they are all carbed still. Especially drag cars! I suspect that any several other reasons is why!
Hope I explained myself clearly enough
 
  #20  
Old 02-03-2006 | 06:52 PM
RaptorRandy27's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
From: The Great Northwest
Default Raptor660 vs. Raptor700

Originally posted by: maddog56
Are they faster? Sure. Do they handle better? Heck yes. Is the 700 making the 660 obsolete junk? Not at all.

Are many of the new 700 owners just as cocky or more so than 660 owners were back in 00/01? You bet.

I sure as hell hope that wasn't aimed at me there maddog[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img] As I can find nothing cocky in what I posted.
 


Quick Reply: Raptor660 vs. Raptor700



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.