Polaris Discussions about Polaris ATVs.

Sportsman w/ 400 2-stroke?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2001 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
Campy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Default

I was just looking at used ATV values at kbb.com the other day, when I stumbled into the '97 Polaris selection, and saw that, according to KBB (and NADA Guides, now that I look there), there was a Sportsman produced in that model year with the 400cc (378cc) 2-stroke, also found in the Xplorer and Scrambler. Is this really true (I have to ask... its not the first misprint I've seen on KBB), and if so, is there anyone that has one that can give me their opinion on it. Also, is this in the Gen IV chassis, or the Gen III?

I've always wanted the power of my Xplorer, but with the better ride of independant rear suspension. If anyone can attest to these things, then I'll seriously look into getting one of these things.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2001 | 09:29 PM
  #2  
CWSmith's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Yes there was a Sp 400 2-stroke. Its was a chain drive with a straight rear axel. I don't know about the frame.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2001 | 12:15 AM
  #3  
Farmking's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

I had one,it was the same body and frame as the old 350L & 400L with a few extra's like rack extenders, heavy duty rear spring, and tow hooks.It was sold mainly for hunters.In 93 they were 350 sportsmans,in 94 they were change to 400 sportsmans.I traded it for a magnum 425 thats basically the same thing,except it had a 4 stroke motor.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2001 | 09:15 AM
  #4  
Campy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Default

It was before they introduced IRS onto the Sportsman?

Well that sucks...
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2001 | 12:18 PM
  #5  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

That's my baby! From what I've learned so far, it only came in green otherwise its basically the same as the xplorer except for the body. My machine is a GenII, & has steel racks.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2001 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
Campy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Default

Why must we all be doomed to have power at the expense of ride quality?
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2001 | 01:37 PM
  #7  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

Campy... I can live with the ride quality, it may not be IRS but it works for me. Anyway my seat is nice & comfy.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2001 | 03:20 PM
  #8  
Campy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Default

I suppose. The swing-arm/straight axle on my Xplorer isn't all that bad (it sure beats no suspension at all). However, I've driven my uncle's Sportsman HO, and the ride is soo much better, but its not nearly as powerful as my Xplorer.

It makes me wonder... why doesn't Polaris put the 378cc 2-stroke into a Sportsman frame?
 
Reply
Old May 28, 2001 | 02:15 AM
  #9  
ZoomZoom's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Default

I also think the 400 2-stroke would be a sweet engine in the new Sportsmans, but the emmissions **** are trying to eliminate it even though we have the technology to reduce the emmissions. This is the last year anybody can buy the Polaris 400 2-stroke,(Xplorer model only). Too bad!:-(
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jmuddin284
Polaris
8
Jan 19, 2026 07:16 AM
79hugger
Polaris
5
Aug 30, 2015 02:21 PM
NatePerz
Suzuki
6
Jul 27, 2015 03:27 AM
ATVC Correspondent
Ask the Editor
12
Jul 21, 2015 06:57 AM
ATVC Correspondent
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
0
Jul 7, 2015 11:00 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.