CAN-AM (BRP) Discussions about CAN-AM ATVs.

Outlander Vs. Polaris xp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-06-2010 | 03:44 PM
DCT's Avatar
DCT
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by Cardiac
I haven't owned the new Polaris, had an older model which was nothing but problems. I frequent a lot of the ATV forums and I have noticed a lot of guys who rushed to buy the 850 XP and have now sold them and went with the Outlander XT-P. Sometimes the real world speaks volumes above the "reviews".
Yep, I had a "newer" model PoPo and had nothing but problems with it. I know some folks have luck with them, but IMHO, too many folks don't. The ratio of good to bad is not what I consider to be acceptable.

Yep again, there are a number of folks who had 850's and have moved on... many to the Outtty. I wish them good luck with their machines.
 
  #12  
Old 03-06-2010 | 08:02 PM
White347LX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Guard1
Here's another post by the same ( 2010 Max Ltd and Renegade X Xc, out tearing it up... ). I found his reviews to be very detailed and unbiased. I certainly agree that a 2up machine is superior to a 1-up. He picked the XP over a regular Outty. But does not own Polaris. Seems un-biased to me.
I guess the idea of a 2up machine being superior to a regular one in "technical" trails depends completely on one's idea of technical terrain. What I would call tough or technical trails are ones that sport quads really have to slow down for or can't even get through, a full size 4x4 ATV barely fits through and anything bigger would be wedged between trees or hung up and high centered due to the longer wheelbase.

These same trails make a Brute Force or Grizzly look like a sport quad compared to the heavier ATVs which really stress the rider who has to muscle a 800+ lb machine through places it can't fit. I honestly couldn't imagine trying to get a longer 2 up machine through the same places.

It's like saying a full size truck is a better trail rig than a Jeep Wrangler.
 
  #13  
Old 03-07-2010 | 07:21 AM
Guard1's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by White347LX
I guess the idea of a 2up machine being superior to a regular one in "technical" trails depends completely on one's idea of technical terrain. What I would call tough or technical trails are ones that sport quads really have to slow down for or can't even get through, a full size 4x4 ATV barely fits through and anything bigger would be wedged between trees or hung up and high centered due to the longer wheelbase.

These same trails make a Brute Force or Grizzly look like a sport quad compared to the heavier ATVs which really stress the rider who has to muscle a 800+ lb machine through places it can't fit. I honestly couldn't imagine trying to get a longer 2 up machine through the same places.

It's like saying a full size truck is a better trail rig than a Jeep Wrangler.
I am not suggesting that a larger 2-up machine will go through very tight trails as easily. I don't ride or ever see trails that I cannot fit ( in fact most SxS's will fit most of our trails ). Sport quads cannot go through the same stuff as a 4x4 ( whether it's a 2-up or a 1-up ). I had a Prairie 650 before my current Max, and I can attest that the stability,ride and comfort on the Max are all better than the 1-up machines. I never have to wrestle my machine , as it makes almost everything easy...all while sitting comfortably in the seat. The 2-up Max is very confidence inspiring. Sure there are times when one has to stand up and lean or what not ( especially when negotiating big bog holes or climbing up some big rocky ridges ). I ride with machine's from Eiger 400 and Honda 400 right up to the 800 Max's...and the Max's go everywhere the smaller ones do, and they do it generally easier and smoother, not to mention faster. After a year of riding my Max and with 2 other 2-ups in our group...I can without doubt say that the only thing I've seen a 1-up do slightly better is make smaller circles in a parking lot. Maybe the Max is not as easy to "whip" around with body language...but I find there is really not much need for it. Point and shoot baby...that's it.

Another area of superiority is the high speed ride and handling. I ride a rough woods road, near my cabin. I can reach speeds on the Max I could not even think about on the Kawi. I simply fly over stuff with the longer wheel base that would have tossed the Kawi around. The ride is smoother and faster, all while feeling more planted.
 
  #14  
Old 03-08-2010 | 01:49 PM
Specta's Avatar
Pro Rider
Loves riding and can't get enough.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,949
Likes: 2
Default

I've riden an 09 800 Outlander Max and thought is was a nice ride but I have never riden an 850 Polaris 2-up but I have riden a 2010 550 Touring.

My best friend owns an AC 500 and the plastic gets so hot from the exhaust he says had he known that he never would have bought it.

I rode the Outlander in November so heat was not an issue. My friend told me that it gets so hot in warmer weather that it just about melts his skin to the plastic and I don't think I'd care for the exrtra heat in the summer.

Maybe they addressed that issue in 2010.
 
  #15  
Old 03-08-2010 | 02:01 PM
Specta's Avatar
Pro Rider
Loves riding and can't get enough.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,949
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by White347LX
It's like saying a full size truck is a better trail rig than a Jeep Wrangler.

I'm not a 2-up fan but we're only talking about an 8" length difference, not hardly enough to make a huge difference on the tighter trails.

It's more like comparing a CJ5 to a CJ7, not a Jeep to a full size truck.

On edit; 09 Outlander Max review - http://www.atv.com/manufacturers/can...view-1542.html
 
  #16  
Old 03-08-2010 | 03:34 PM
Bill Toepke's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Default

I am not interested in a 2-up in either brand. I currently am riding an '04 500 sportsman and so far no problems. Only reason I am contimplating a new machine is I have been wanting a twin for some time now and also want fuel injection. I had always thought that the outlander was smaller than the sportsman but looks to be a little wider/longer. But that is a moot point I guess. So far the only real knock I have against the can-am is I would have to drive over an hour to buy and service the machine versus the 10 minute ride I have to a polaris shop. Other than that it sounds like quite the machine. Fit and finish on both brands seems to be top notch.
 
  #17  
Old 03-09-2010 | 07:30 AM
broadfieldpoint's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cardiac
I haven't owned the new Polaris, had an older model which was nothing but problems. I frequent a lot of the ATV forums and I have noticed a lot of guys who rushed to buy the 850 XP and have now sold them and went with the Outlander XT-P. Sometimes the real world speaks volumes above the "reviews".



This is the truth. The bottom line is the consumer. I have a Polaris and an Outty. Love the Outty (on my 2nd) and really like the 500 HO (tank). Bottom line is that they all have there strengths and weaknesses.
 
  #18  
Old 03-16-2010 | 09:54 AM
White347LX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Specta
I'm not a 2-up fan but we're only talking about an 8" length difference, not hardly enough to make a huge difference on the tighter trails.

It's more like comparing a CJ5 to a CJ7, not a Jeep to a full size truck.

On edit; 09 Outlander Max review - 2009 Can-Am Outlander MAX 800R EFI XT Review

Again, this depends entirely on your idea of tight or technical trails. The longer wheelbase would obviously be more stable in straight sections but the trees, ruts, steep creek banks around here are tight enough with a Brute Force or Grizzly. You'd need a chainsaw to clear new trails for anything bigger. I'd still try it, though. :-)

8" change in wheelbase on a Jeep makes it a entirely different machine. And relatively speaking, 8" on a ATV is like 16" on a Jeep since it's about twice as long to start with. This is exactly why the regular Wrangler is a better trail rig than the Unlimited in most conditions.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NoJoke
Polaris
21
08-09-2015 12:39 PM
Nazz26
Introduce Yourself
24
07-30-2015 11:51 AM
Gtsordo
CAN-AM (BRP)
8
07-22-2015 01:27 PM
1000gade
ATV Videos
1
07-16-2015 10:48 AM
RedRancher
Yamaha
10
07-10-2015 06:36 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Outlander Vs. Polaris xp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 PM.