KERMIT CHATTER
#2221
04-18-2006, 11:45 PM
T Rex Rider
What irritates me is!
Those 6-packs work pretty good.
What irritates me is!
Those 6-packs work pretty good.
#2222
04-19-2006, 12:04 AM
T Rex Rider
What irritates me is!
Those 6-packs work pretty good.
What irritates me is!
Those 6-packs work pretty good.
#2223
04-19-2006, 12:08 AM
#2224
04-19-2006, 12:12 AM
T Rex Rider
What irritates me is!
Those 6-packs work pretty good.
What irritates me is!
Those 6-packs work pretty good.
#2225
04-19-2006, 12:16 AM
#2226
04-19-2006, 12:29 AM
KERMIT CHATTER
[quote]
Originally posted by: gofastshee
[quote]
Originally posted by: ConcernedDuner
[quote]
Originally posted by: gofastshee
Yeah it kind of like heading IN from a ride only difference is your heading OUT.
That's why I said- its impossible to visually be able to know when you're entering other people's property- never had to be worried with it up until NOW~
[quote]
Originally posted by: gofastshee
Why so you can tear them down or just ignore them? because nobodys going to screw with your riding area and get away with it. Kind of like some of your members did when Unocal put up the chain link fence a few years ago...go ahead deny it....I know better.
Talk about slander- I mean if you know for a fact that this group did it-- why doesn't anyone else- why weren't charges filed by the oil company- COME ON- like you say, we're suppose to take your word for it??? Stop trying to slander this group because they have done nothing wrong-- unless you're looking thru some freaky, deaky cool KSI's glasses~
We've all seen lots of things~
Originally posted by: gofastshee
[quote]
Originally posted by: ConcernedDuner
Originally posted by: ConcernedDuner
Have you ever gone on a ride STARTING at the back of the dunes?
Have you ever gone on a ride STARTING at the back of the dunes?
Originally posted by: gofastshee
Yeah it kind of like heading IN from a ride only difference is your heading OUT.
That's why I said- its impossible to visually be able to know when you're entering other people's property- never had to be worried with it up until NOW~
Originally posted by: ConcernedDuner
there is also a responsibility for Danny to mark off his land from the back of the dunes in case someone does get lost.
there is also a responsibility for Danny to mark off his land from the back of the dunes in case someone does get lost.
Originally posted by: gofastshee
Why so you can tear them down or just ignore them? because nobodys going to screw with your riding area and get away with it. Kind of like some of your members did when Unocal put up the chain link fence a few years ago...go ahead deny it....I know better.
Talk about slander- I mean if you know for a fact that this group did it-- why doesn't anyone else- why weren't charges filed by the oil company- COME ON- like you say, we're suppose to take your word for it??? Stop trying to slander this group because they have done nothing wrong-- unless you're looking thru some freaky, deaky cool KSI's glasses~
Originally posted by: ConcernedDuner
I in no way condone intentional provoking, but this is just not the case in this instance.
I in no way condone intentional provoking, but this is just not the case in this instance.
Originally posted by: gofastshee
you say you don’t condone it …….But your definitely not against doing it yourself we’ve seen that.
you say you don’t condone it …….But your definitely not against doing it yourself we’ve seen that.
#2227
04-19-2006, 12:43 AM
#2228
04-19-2006, 01:05 AM
#2229
04-19-2006, 01:25 AM
KERMIT CHATTER
Originally posted by: txcowgirl06
Ripper you finally got something right! You better be able to visually determine where the boundaries are. That is the riders responsibility!
Ripper you finally got something right! You better be able to visually determine where the boundaries are. That is the riders responsibility!
Which makes that doubly hard for me-- I'm still trying to find yours much less try and read it [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif[/img]
#2230
04-19-2006, 02:02 AM
KERMIT CHATTER
Cow, I bet you missed this post waaay back there- thought I'd help you out~
perpetrator means he's the bad guy [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img]
Originally posted by: Scootergptx
Am I just getting confused? If you cant' candone an action, then it's wrong. No matter what circumstances you try to add.
I have enough firearm/weapons license to fill your wallet, so I have to know the law. He can say whatever he likes, but he did not use justifiable force in this issue. Perhaps if he studied the Use of Force Continuum, he'd know where he stands now. That's one jury you don't want someone who knows the law on.
I have pulled a weapon on someone before. Probably won't be the last time either. But I knew who's butt was going to be in a sling if I fired. They ran, threat averted, no legal course to fire. Same sort of circumstances it sounds like. By firing his weapon, he just became the [b]perpetrator[b]
Am I just getting confused? If you cant' candone an action, then it's wrong. No matter what circumstances you try to add.
I have enough firearm/weapons license to fill your wallet, so I have to know the law. He can say whatever he likes, but he did not use justifiable force in this issue. Perhaps if he studied the Use of Force Continuum, he'd know where he stands now. That's one jury you don't want someone who knows the law on.
I have pulled a weapon on someone before. Probably won't be the last time either. But I knew who's butt was going to be in a sling if I fired. They ran, threat averted, no legal course to fire. Same sort of circumstances it sounds like. By firing his weapon, he just became the [b]perpetrator[b]