Performance Mods and Project Quads Share and ask for information about modifying your ATV or building project quads.

4-stroke's suck!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 01:13 AM
  #301  
Whitedog's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

Wow 300 post![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-cool.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2004 | 01:40 AM
  #302  
04LERaptor's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

2-strokes vs 4-strokes.......You are all a bunch of bitches stroking your own cranks. They both have there good points and bad.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #303  
pimp250r's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

Backflip only on a 4 stroke? That doesn't have much to do with anything. If a two stroke can get decent traction going up hill it
can do a backflip too. All you really need is to get the right angle and height, or basically, attempt to jump as high and short as you can.
Stroke has nothing to do with it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2004 | 05:51 PM
  #304  
MooseUnit's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

YFZ450 vs. 250r vs. banshee vs. 450R stock for stock for stock for stock, What do u think
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 01:06 AM
  #305  
pimp250r's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

Stock for stock probably:
YFZ,450R,Banshee,250R
That's expected. These new four strokers are setup and tuned way better from the factory than the other quads.
Modded for hp and speed:
Banshee, 250R, YFZ/450R
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:46 AM
  #306  
CroBiker's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

i think with equal riders, and stock against stock in the pismo sand, it would be the yfz and 450r in first, then the banshee, then the 250r. the only thing that would hold the banshee back would be its lack of traction.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #307  
ThreeWRacer's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

From personal expierience I feel the banshee is better than the yfz in the sand, It just has the right powerband its a lighter rougher but overall...................banshee in the sand.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #308  
GTFZ250's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

hey BANSHEESMOKER I dont know what else your smoking but last time I checked it was those dam pos harleys that are all noise and no poise. Harleys=dinosaur design( there is a new fandangeled device called a WATER-COOLED engine),loud, oil leakin,v-twins that cant run worth a ****. So step off.
 
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #309  
CroBiker's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

threewracer: r u thinkin banshee is better stock for stock, or with paddles and maybe light mods. everything i've heard says that the banshee has trouble getting traction with stock tires, and i know that my buddy's shee sucks in the sand. he's puttin out about 65 hp and does flattrack racing, but it a drag race in the sand, my 450r with stock tires (banshee had holeshots) would win. we switched bikes and it was the same every time.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 04:49 PM
  #310  
DaBeechMan's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

your buddy is making 52hp
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.