ITP MudLite XTR Tires
#11
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: stendori
i would keep same size dia. tire front and back. you siad xtr's in title then mentioned mud lites in post. you do realize there is a big differnce between these tires right?</end quote></div>
I think he is talking about these MudLite XTR's from ITP......there is no difference, they are the same[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
http://www.itptires.com/utilityatv/mudlite_xtr.html
i would keep same size dia. tire front and back. you siad xtr's in title then mentioned mud lites in post. you do realize there is a big differnce between these tires right?</end quote></div>
I think he is talking about these MudLite XTR's from ITP......there is no difference, they are the same[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
http://www.itptires.com/utilityatv/mudlite_xtr.html
#12
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I had to run the weekend with 25 Carlisle Badlands xtr in the front and 28 Outlaws on the rear. (Its an long story) The bike is a 2002 700. Anyway, I ran as I always do with the AWD on the whole time being mindful of the same point that are listed here. The front wheels seemed to engage and disengage normally. I personally wouldn't run with the difference in size if for no other reason just because I want all the ground clearance I can get!
#13
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: gould62
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: stendori
i would keep same size dia. tire front and back. you siad xtr's in title then mentioned mud lites in post. you do realize there is a big differnce between these tires right?</end quote></div>
I think he is talking about these MudLite XTR's from ITP......there is no difference, they are the same[img][/img]
http://www.itptires.com/utilityatv/mudlite_xtr.html</end quote></div>
i know that. my point was there is a big differnce between the reg. mud lites and the mud lite xtr's (which i have and had the mud lites). i dont know if he knows there is a differnce between them is all i was refering too.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: stendori
i would keep same size dia. tire front and back. you siad xtr's in title then mentioned mud lites in post. you do realize there is a big differnce between these tires right?</end quote></div>
I think he is talking about these MudLite XTR's from ITP......there is no difference, they are the same[img][/img]
http://www.itptires.com/utilityatv/mudlite_xtr.html</end quote></div>
i know that. my point was there is a big differnce between the reg. mud lites and the mud lite xtr's (which i have and had the mud lites). i dont know if he knows there is a differnce between them is all i was refering too.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
#14
#15
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well just my opinion, but I would want my front the same diameter so my front can
be adequete enough for AWD usuage if rears slip while in MUD or other slippery
applications. I would think if the front were smaller in size it would put that much
more pressure/load on the front to pull out the back which could present a problem
in the long-term.
R'
be adequete enough for AWD usuage if rears slip while in MUD or other slippery
applications. I would think if the front were smaller in size it would put that much
more pressure/load on the front to pull out the back which could present a problem
in the long-term.
R'
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATVC Correspondent
Drivetrain, Suspension & Tires
2
09-30-2015 01:37 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)