I like how in the 250 shootout,they gave the explorer the worst score on the chart for features, but in the article they said word for word"while not as bad as the Artic cat, the polaris is a little lacking in the feature department"
Any body understand how they can say two totally opposite statements and still have the shootout mean anything?

 

Man ur crazy, I could tell you plenty of issues where polarises come in first. I would rather have a Suzuki than a polaris!!!