Utility ATVs Discussions on utility ATVs.

Mountain Climbing ATV's

Old Jun 18, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #51  
raidermike67's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

Ok so maybe a sport bike wont make it thru deep mud. Most people quit playing in the mud after theyre 12. And If your buddy grew some *****, you all would not need to be stoping and helping him out. >>>>>>>>


We've had a tremendous amount of rain and there are trails where u either go through the mud or you turn around....u cross the creek or u turn around. I've ridden through water on my Rincon I wouldn't even think about going through on a YFZ, not knocking the quad but it simply isn't designed for this type of riding. So while I'm crossing through the creek you're stuck at the end of a trail, enjoy your ride back to camp. LOL

Maybe if you grew a brain you wouldn't respond in such an ignorant manner.

Have a terrific day!
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #52  
BryceGTX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

And here we have a problem I have encountered with sport quads being used on many trails. Due to their not being very good at negotiating through the woods and over obstacles they need to rely on wheel speed and power. Also with all of that rear wheel horsepower and torque on tap you have a lot of roosting and wheel spinning. Hey, it's hard not to. That's what sport quads are for. What all this means is that they as a general rule will tear up the trail much worse than a 4x4 atv which does not require all of that wheels spin to negotiate an obstacle or section of trail. I
90% of the power required to go up a step hill is put through the rear tires. Given that the UTE weighs 150-300 more than the sports quads, it requires the other 10% through the front wheels just to get up the hill. And it will be spinning 4 wheels going up the hill instead of two. Seems to me the ute is creating just as much damage. Also, last time I checked the UTEs have bigger engines than the sports quads. Last time I checked, the only ones making the big rutted out mud holes is the UTEs. Not the sparts quads. Seems to me we should not be putting the blame on anyone.. there is more than enough to go around.
Bryce
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 10:56 PM
  #53  
BryceGTX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

nobody is really thinking a sport quad is gonna do best for this guy. lets get real here. a few loose rocks on the trail and that's the end of it. i live in the Northern Rockies, and our regular trails usually start at 5,000' or 6000' and go to about 10,000'. the sport quads just can't do it. all it takes is one big rock to straddle or a slick log across the trail. they are fun and fast, but not good here.
Hmm.. lets look at the numbers. My rear tires are 1 inch wider than your rear tires. You quad is probably at least 150-200 pounds heavier than my quad. My quad has 12 inches of ground clearance under the frame, lowest is under the SRA. My quad has two inches more suspension travel in the rear than yours. It has almost 1.5 inches more travel in the front. It seems to me, that my 250 will be better at some obstacles than your 650. With its wider rear tires and lower weight, it may climb better than yours. Funny thing is, my towing capacity is 850 pounds, only 400 pounds shy of yours. Your biggest advantage to climbing may be that you have more HP necessary to get a running start on the really steep ones. Don't underestimate the ability of a sports quad.

It seems to me that a 4000 foot climb may be no big deal depending on the terrain. What is really difficult is the steepness of the hill. So a 50 foot climb might be worse than your 4000 foot climb.

You are putting way to much emphasis on the climbing ability of 4wd. Seems to me that on a really steep hill, most of your power will have to put through your narrower rear tires, and you will have to have 4wd just to compensate for that and your additional weight.
Bryce
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #54  
v2rider's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,752
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

You obviously havnt been up against a 4x4 ute quad before, or you wouldnt be thinking you could compete in 4x4 terrain. I can say i wouldnt be near you in a race on a track, through woops, and in hairpin turns, but up a steep, wet, rocky hill, i will have had my lunch at the top by the time you get there.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 11:32 PM
  #55  
BryceGTX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

LOL v2rider.. I am not so stupid to suggest that I will take on a 4wd ute in his back yard. But don't think that a 2wd quad is handicapped by much without the 4wd. Maybe you think that your quad in 2wd is the same as a sports quad, but you will be making a very poor assumption. The sports quad is not carrying around all the weight and friction of the 4wd.
Bryce
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 11:34 PM
  #56  
v2rider's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,752
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

Oh no, like i said, in a race on a track, i see your tail light and thats it. lol!!
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 11:41 PM
  #57  
medic13's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

I have to agree i recently bought a 06 Honda rincon 680 and truly love it but have to admit there are some places i can't go that my older Honda TRX 300 went , and yes they did improve the engine braking in 06 so far been fine with me . I have to agree with reconranger. he hit it on the head , you don't need the tallest ground clarence ect you need a good preforming machine , with great gear ratio and not allot of extra weight and plenty of power that would be a a rancher if was me don't get me wrong my older 1989 trx 300 would climb like a mule better than my rincon to be honest but with all the extra power and size my choice would be the rancher.
 
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2006 | 11:45 PM
  #58  
montyh's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

yea, crunch yer numbers all you want. you have about as much chance in the mountains as i'd have on a MX track. not only is 4x4 a necessity, a front diff lock is gonna get you farther. you gotta remember, mountains are made out of rock. not the nice little rock on roads, either.

monty
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 08:28 AM
  #59  
jrpowersports's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

Originally posted by: v2rider
Originally posted by: jrpowersports
Ok so maybe a sport bike wont make it thru deep mud. Most people quit playing in the mud after theyre 12. And If your buddy grew some *****, you all would not need to be stoping and helping him out.
Most people stop playing with training wheels when they are kids too, what happened to you??
Hu hu hu hu aint you a smart cookie. Your daddy with his sixth grade education teach you that retarded come back????
 
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2006 | 08:43 AM
  #60  
jrpowersports's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default Mountain Climbing ATV's

Maybe if some of you people would do a little research before you start running your mouth. First of all I told him he would be happy with the 450 wolverine. If you would take some time to check it out on the yamaha website, you would understand why I recommended it, and why I refered to it as a semi sport bike. It has the belt drive trans(similar to grizz), push button 4x4, 8.7" GC, 516lbs dry, ect. Never once did I tell him to get a raptor, I made a statment saying that I have a raptor and I prefer to ride it over the grizz. So pay attention, and lets all make the world a smarter place.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.