Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Blaster Vs. Warrior

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #31  
wanaply21's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

ohh i forgot to mention 2untouchables690 i raced a truck well not exactley i was running beside him to see how fast my bike went and my bike was stock he couldnt catch up to me until i was in 6th maxing out at 66mph where ever u heard 56mph that gye or gal dosnt know as much as they think
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 04:42 PM
  #32  
jed250's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

Originally posted by: wanaply21
ohh i forgot to mention 2untouchables690 i raced a truck well not exactley i was running beside him to see how fast my bike went and my bike was stock he couldnt catch up to me until i was in 6th maxing out at 66mph where ever u heard 56mph that gye or gal dosnt know as much as they think
Why don't you get a GPS and clock yourself?

I hear many different things about a Warrior VS a Blaster. Most of the stuff I hear come from the forums here. The other thing I heard is from my friend, who we will call "friend 1", that owns a Warrior. My other friend (we'll call him friend 2) has a blaster. This is how it goes so far:

Friend 1: Warrior
Friend 2: Blaster

They raced each other and Friend 1 won the race. Both machines are stock. Things to consider though:

Friend 1 must weigh 20 pounds less than Friend 2
Friend 2's blaster wasn't in perfect shape, in the end of it's life, my Fourtrax 250 beat him in a race.

I don't know what else to consider heh. Anyways, I think a Warrior would probably beat a Blaster in a long drag strip, but on an mx track, I think a Blaster would win. From what I experienced, the Blaster's gearing isn't as high as the warrior's. I got on the blaster, stepped on the gas (1st gear) and it really pulled me. The Warrior didn't pull as hard in first gear.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 05:32 PM
  #33  
Trinity748's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

Who the hell cares...get a real quad then talk about it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 05:43 PM
  #34  
BlackRaptor's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

These threads are so dumb because no one will agree.
Someone is going to think here quad is just a little fasting.
It's a never ending loop.
Instead of talking smack go out and race these quads you've supposedly smoked all day long video tape it then come on and talk smack with something backing you up.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 07:23 PM
  #35  
jed250's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

Originally posted by: BlackRaptor
These threads are so dumb because no one will agree.
Someone is going to think here quad is just a little fasting.
It's a never ending loop.
Instead of talking smack go out and race these quads you've supposedly smoked all day long video tape it then come on and talk smack with something backing you up.

I've seen videos of a Banshee beat a Warrior in a race[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] No way anyone can argue with that one. Heh. I think the Warrior had a pipe on.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #36  
n2atvs's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

Well I have a bicycle with a FMF sticker on the front fork and a high speed reflector on the back and it will beat all 'yall.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #37  
jed250's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

Originally posted by: n2atvs
Well I have a bicycle with a FMF sticker on the front fork and a high speed reflector on the back and it will beat all 'yall.
Wait what kind of gearing does it have?

Anyways, I've go ta 21 speed mountain bike and I don't know how large my tires are but they are pretty big. It's a pretty quick bike. I always wondered how BMX riders on their BMX bikes can go as quick as they do because they only have one gearing and it seems like a "speed gearing" and not a "power gearing". Anyways, my little brother and I swapped bikes (he's got a small 5 speed) and it's got taller gearing in first gear, but it I accelerated it pretty quickly. I then realized that because the tires are small on it, it accelerated quickly. This is why BMX bikes are probably easy for BMX riders.

 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2004 | 11:49 PM
  #38  
2untouchables690's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

wanaply21 there is no way a stock blaster goes 66 stock it's a 195cc, 2-Stroke Single, Air Cooled, Reed Valve so by saying that does 66 and a banshee which is a 347cc, 2-Stroke Twin, Liquid Cooled, Reed Valve quad and it does about 75. So what you are telling me is that a a 195cc air cooled blaster does about 9 mph slower than a 347cc twin liquid cooled banshee because if you think your blaster does 66 stock then you need to stop smoking them trees dude

ohh and also its the older warriors that were faster like the 87 and 88 not the 98
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 12:09 AM
  #39  
wanaply21's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

dude a stock schee is much faster than that u could ask my cuz but he dosnt use comps that much by the way hes had 3... ones in peices the other 2 one is a trail bike and the other is strictley racing ill even put a link for u to see his racing bike not to mention has over 5 grand worth of work done to it http://www.newtowndragway.com/6-20jr.jpg
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #40  
2untouchables690's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default Blaster Vs. Warrior

uhh i hate to tell you but every quad company made an agreement to keep there quads top speeds under 78 mph stock straight out of the crate and and there isn't any stock blaster doing 66
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM.