WSanders 12 tooth sprocket info!!!
#2
Sorry guys, man have I been busy lately! I have only ridden it once with the new sprocket and I didn't have my GPS handy that day. I can say that the 12 tooth sprocket is very much an improvement and should be perfect for most folks. The reverse is STILL way too fast though.
I'll post the GPS results just as soon as I can get them and then I'm going to try an 11 tooth sprocket.
I'll post the GPS results just as soon as I can get them and then I'm going to try an 11 tooth sprocket.
#3
Just a word of caution regarding an 11 tooth sprocket with a 520 chain; most people do not recommend using c/s sprockets smaller than 12 teeth due to the extreme angle the chain is subjected to in travelling over the sprocket, causing chain breakage & other damage. A larger rear sprocket might be the way to go.
#5
x250rDude
I guess you were wider awake than me..Yes, if a 12 T. doesn't give one enough torque, the solution is a larger rear sprocket. Actually if it were me, I think I'd stick with the stock c/s and just go up four teeth on the rear. I would just not be comfortable with the sharp angle of the chain over a 12 tooth. Of course, switching rear sprockets is more costly but maybe better in the long haul. The approximate rule of thumb in sprocket gearing is 2 teeth on rear = one tooth on front. Using that guide line, a 44 T. rear & a 13 T. c/s would approximate the same gearing as using an 11/40 gearing.
Thanks for calling the error to my attention. I'm a firm believer in," bad info is worse than no info".
I guess you were wider awake than me..Yes, if a 12 T. doesn't give one enough torque, the solution is a larger rear sprocket. Actually if it were me, I think I'd stick with the stock c/s and just go up four teeth on the rear. I would just not be comfortable with the sharp angle of the chain over a 12 tooth. Of course, switching rear sprockets is more costly but maybe better in the long haul. The approximate rule of thumb in sprocket gearing is 2 teeth on rear = one tooth on front. Using that guide line, a 44 T. rear & a 13 T. c/s would approximate the same gearing as using an 11/40 gearing.
Thanks for calling the error to my attention. I'm a firm believer in," bad info is worse than no info".
#7
It looks like we were both wrong. According to Sidewinder, an 11/40 gearing =3.64
A 13/47=3.62
That looks like 7 teeth to me, and I'll let you do the math.
A 13/47=3.62
That looks like 7 teeth to me, and I'll let you do the math.
Trending Topics
#8
Here is the correct info
stock is 13/40=3.077
my setup is 12/40=3.33
I also have an 11 tooth which would be 11/40=3.64
If you did not want the angle
severity, you could go with this 12/43=3.58
12/44=3.66
I have not tried my 11 tooth sprocket yet, so i cannot tell you if it works right.
stock is 13/40=3.077
my setup is 12/40=3.33
I also have an 11 tooth which would be 11/40=3.64
If you did not want the angle
severity, you could go with this 12/43=3.58
12/44=3.66
I have not tried my 11 tooth sprocket yet, so i cannot tell you if it works right.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)




