Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

i really wish yamaha would have thought the raptor out better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-08-2001, 07:07 PM
RideRed04's Avatar
Pro Rider
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have been reading the raptor threads lately, and noticed that the raptor is not doing good for reliablity! they took 400cc class parts and put them on a 660! what where they thinking? i am not trying to bash, if yamaha had thought to put a stronger, wider axle and a-arms, a beefier cluch, a stronger frame, and a better transmission, i probably would be on the waiting list for one right now! one raptor in the baja broke a frame, and one had the tranny lock up, which isnt all that uncommon! i wish the magazines wouldnt think that every new quad is the greatest. when they did the shootout between the raptor and 400ex, they said the raptor's clutch was bullet proof. the engine isnt that strong as a 660 should be, and yamaha should have just used the otusu radials instead of haveing dunlop come up with a generic copy that didnt silde well. i bet there would be a lot of changed honda guys if yamaha would have done this one right. tell me, am i way off the mark? is it just a few lemons? or is ihatemyraptor right?
 
  #2  
Old 02-08-2001, 07:23 PM
54warrior's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree.

I would go buy a used 400EX before buying a raptor.

Just my opinion, and I am a big Yamaha fan.
 
  #3  
Old 02-08-2001, 07:31 PM
DuneJammer's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think that there is a reliability, design, or quality problem with the Yamaha Raptor 660r. As our dunes around here are still rideable I have been down there quite a bit lately and have run into literally dozens of Raptor riders. Out of everyone I have had conversations with the only problems I have heard of are the result of 'gravity damage'. I'm not saying that these people that come on the forum are lying about having a problem, but most people I run into arent jumping 60 feet either. I weigh 235 pounds and ride very hard. My extent of jumping would be less than 10 feet off dune faces and maybe a 15-20 foot dune drop-off and I haven't had a problem yet. I hope that these reliability problems are isolated incidences and I never do have a problem.
With reliabiltiy aside, whether there is or isn't a problem. I would (no offense intended) DARE you to ride my stock Raptor and not come back with a grin ear-to-ear, the suspension and power is top notch. I think that most people would be on the waiting list for one if they:
A. Had ridden one.
B. Could afford one
c. Hadn't just layed down some serious cash for a 400EX, DS650 etc. (If I had a nice one of these I might not have bought a Raptor)

'01 Blue Raptor '00 Trailblazer '99 Scrambler 400 4x4
 
  #4  
Old 02-08-2001, 08:52 PM
RideRed04's Avatar
Pro Rider
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i am not saying i wouldnt love to have a raptor, who wouldnt! i am just saying that with all that power, the narowness seems like it is a huge problem. i haven't put any money down on anything. for the extra almost $1000 i can make the 400ex a faster machine. their are always nice 2000 400ex's in the paper here for $4,500, and that is $2,000 less than a raptor! that is the cost of a pro-trax frame! the main reason i am getting the 400ex is because i dont need the speed being a woods rider, and the handeling is much more important to me, thats why i say if they where wider and could slide, i might not be so against them.
 
  #5  
Old 02-08-2001, 08:55 PM
Rude660r's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I own both, a 400EX with extensive mods, and a raptor with only bolt on stuff..(bumpers,skids,bars,FMF slip-on)and this is my take. After riding both bikes one after the other,... I believe the 400 will be finding a new
home. And Iam primarily a Honda fan...(so Im keeping the 88 250R)... for the things I find the raptor can't do.
 
  #6  
Old 02-08-2001, 11:26 PM
chasman's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really think people are missing the point. The raptor has done more for this sport than any of you bashing it realize. Now you will see the other mfg's get off their butts and build something comparable to it. By the way you can't buy a new 400ex and put $1,000 into it and run with the raptor. The raptor has more sack stock than you could probably handle anyway. You will never be able to ride it to it's fullest potential. If you could let me know and I'll sponsor you so you can go run with Travis Spader. In closing, buy the 400 ex and spend $1,000 on it, then go run a raptor in a straight line, mx track and in the woods. Then go home and put the 400ex in the local paper for sale.

Chasman
01 blk/wht raptor

P.S.
I tried a modified 400ex before I bought the raptor and wasn't that impressed. Trust me I would have loved to save the $800 difference between the 2 quads.
 
  #7  
Old 02-09-2001, 12:01 AM
skramblr's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RideRed,
I'm confused. Exactly what parts do you think they borrowed from a 400cc class machine? I under ithe impression most every part was designed for this bike (except engine/drive parts).

I for one am glad they did not put too wide of an axle. I do tight woods and would never consider a wide axle beast (IE, DS650). This bike is MUCH wider than my warrior already.
 
  #8  
Old 02-09-2001, 12:19 AM
Racer18J's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Chasman,
You said "In closing, buy the 400 ex and spend $1,000 on it, then go run a raptor in a straight line, mx track and in the woods. Then go home and put the 400ex in the local paper for sale."

I hate to tell you, but you are dead wrong about the MX track and the woods racing! You might find that happen with your friends in an amatuer backyard race, but not in the Pro ranks! the pro ranks is when the PRO's can get the most out of the bike, and so far, the 400ex is still on top.

Of the three races you mentioned, the only one you could possibly win would be the straight line event, and even that would not be a cake walk. The first 3 gears are almost a dead heat, the top end is where the Raptor SLOOOOOOOWLY pulls away.

We are not comparing a Corvette against a Yugo here! Sure, the CC advantage of the Raptor sounds staggering, but with decent riders they aren't that far apart, even in the drag race.
 
  #9  
Old 02-09-2001, 01:16 AM
YaMaRaPtoR!'s Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have let 4 people ride my Raptor, result:
1 sandtraxx ported banshee sold
3 400 stock ex's sold
1 440 ex sold modded out.

2 raptors purchased, 3 more on order.
Go figure
 
  #10  
Old 02-09-2001, 01:20 AM
dominator's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you want to talk bang for your buck, strap on a LT500. While people are drooling over raptors for nearly $7,000 the quad with the most horsepower ever offered to the public is going for the dirt under your fingernails. The same goes for the old banshee's...which can be made untouchably fast. I bought a quadracer 500 for $900 that has a fmf pipe and a stock worn out piston. I can nice and sweatly slide away from a raptor and have enough power left over to test out the grab bar. I can still afford a nice tow vehicle too!
 


Quick Reply: i really wish yamaha would have thought the raptor out better



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.