King of the Jungle
#51
You know the funny thing about that is that they do have races for utility class atvs, so yes they are catering to the people that want to race something like that, they have mud bog races and they are catering to those people as well.
Me personnally I have no desire to race a 700-800lb quad that I can not upright by my self and it takes 4 other people to help me do it.
BTW no atv is safe, waking up in the morning is not safe getting out of bed is not safe. There is no safe guarentee in life. I wake up and take a chance walking down the steps to my garage to get in a car and drive down the road.
I dont tempt fate by trying to be king of the hill, and I dont need to win the big stick swinging contest.
I dont need to run 70 mph because unless I am riding the road I will never be able to reach it on any trails I ride. Some people ride trails that they can and do reach that speed, I am rarely above 40mph. So for me I dont think 70 mph is reasonable on a quad for some people it is but not me.
I dont think any quad is "safe" unless you are safe. I have tipped mine twice already.
Me personnally I have no desire to race a 700-800lb quad that I can not upright by my self and it takes 4 other people to help me do it.
BTW no atv is safe, waking up in the morning is not safe getting out of bed is not safe. There is no safe guarentee in life. I wake up and take a chance walking down the steps to my garage to get in a car and drive down the road.
I dont tempt fate by trying to be king of the hill, and I dont need to win the big stick swinging contest.
I dont need to run 70 mph because unless I am riding the road I will never be able to reach it on any trails I ride. Some people ride trails that they can and do reach that speed, I am rarely above 40mph. So for me I dont think 70 mph is reasonable on a quad for some people it is but not me.
I dont think any quad is "safe" unless you are safe. I have tipped mine twice already.
#52
Originally posted by: gtdoctor
I personally don't have any problem with AC coming out with a larger motor, even though I probably would never buy one (I said probably[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]. All the manufacturers, not only AC, are simply responding to what they believe that the consumer wants, and right now, larger displacement motors ARE what the consumer wants. It's funny, Buckeroo, you are very passionate about your argument (and I do think that you make some very valid points), but I have also seen a number of posts from people just as passionate that AC should build a bigger motor. The point is, people feel differently about it, but from AC's perspective, isn't it better to build their 4-wheelers with the widest range of engine displacements that the market will support? It just seems that if they are in business to succeed, that they would have to do that. The other factor to keep in mind is that coming out with a larger motor will generate excitement about AC, and they will actually end up selling more of their smaller displacement quads because of it.
So for me, although I can see a number of negatives regarding these larger displacement motors, I don't blame the companies. They are just responding to what the consumer wants.
I personally don't have any problem with AC coming out with a larger motor, even though I probably would never buy one (I said probably[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]. All the manufacturers, not only AC, are simply responding to what they believe that the consumer wants, and right now, larger displacement motors ARE what the consumer wants. It's funny, Buckeroo, you are very passionate about your argument (and I do think that you make some very valid points), but I have also seen a number of posts from people just as passionate that AC should build a bigger motor. The point is, people feel differently about it, but from AC's perspective, isn't it better to build their 4-wheelers with the widest range of engine displacements that the market will support? It just seems that if they are in business to succeed, that they would have to do that. The other factor to keep in mind is that coming out with a larger motor will generate excitement about AC, and they will actually end up selling more of their smaller displacement quads because of it.
So for me, although I can see a number of negatives regarding these larger displacement motors, I don't blame the companies. They are just responding to what the consumer wants.
Thank you, I appreciate your comments and input. Very constructive for this topic. It is good to have a wide variety of ideas and comment. It is a good thing to see different points of view too. Disagreement is not a bad thing. It is ok to disagree. This is how we form our opinions and base our decisions.
#53
Well one way to look at it - once the factories reach the saturation point with 'big-bore' then they will start to modify the product to be better and not bigger. We may start to see some inovative mods in the handling, durability, capability etc.
#54
At times it may sound like I am not satisified with what AC has provided, that is not true. I am happy with what I have. I wasn't too crazy about the tippiness feeling at times (no serious issues just a feeling), but I have resolved that to my satisfaction with the simple addition of wheel spacers and 6ply tires. I get more wheel travel from swinging a larger arc. I get flatter connering. I get a lower center of gravity and better off-camber support. And the wider stance has not been a 'squeeze' issue yet, but has given me a plus by being able to straddle wider, and to get out of previously made ruts to ride on higher ground. A little softer ride for smaller bumps because of the added leverage to the suspension system. And I have not lost any ground clearance.
And that is not too bad to bring a stock machine to a level of personal satisfaction.
And that is not too bad to bring a stock machine to a level of personal satisfaction.
#55
Originally posted by: buckaroo50
Chumley, They have a moderator for the forum and it is not you. Who in heck appointed you as 'Big-brother' for the meak and mild, the defender of good, and the opressor of evil. And who are you to tell people what they can and can't say and what opinion they should have and how they should express it.
Chumley, They have a moderator for the forum and it is not you. Who in heck appointed you as 'Big-brother' for the meak and mild, the defender of good, and the opressor of evil. And who are you to tell people what they can and can't say and what opinion they should have and how they should express it.
People do buy things based on their ego and self-image - that is fact.
And also people who are misinformed and disillusioned into thinking a certain way also buy things and they may buy the wrong thing, if they don't have the knowledge base or experience or a reliable resource. And if a market trend is set, then that is the direction it will go, until something changes it.
And when people say that a 900+ in a 700lb machine is the best way to go then that is misinformation and causing others that are less knowlegable to be disillusioned into thinking that 'big-bore' is the answer, and if it is a 'big-bore' then it must be better, and that my friend is not true. And as long as people are misinformed and disillusioned they will continue to think that 'big-bore' is better and will continue to buy 'big-bore' and the market trend will continue in that direction.
And as Scott said, anything over a 650 in a 700lb quad is a waste, and I agree. That is my opinion and if you don't agree - fine. And if you want a 900cc 700lb quad for your own ego to do bigger wheelies and go 80mph then that is cool, but don't say it is the best way to go, or it is the best machine. And if your own ego is stroked into the 'King of the Jungle' syndrome - then have at it. But it doesn't impress me. But it does affect the market trend, and if I can disrupt that trend then I will. Then the factories my start to do other things with the current offerings to improve upon them. And that may stop factories from this "power-race" for sales, and the 'biggest and baddest, King of the Jungle' syndrome...
Why did you do all the improvements to your own personal machine? Weren't you satisfied with the factory offerings. Which is precicely my point, there are things they could do to make the product that they already have even better.
I challenge you to actually counter any information in this post as well as others.
"You suck, you are not a moderator, shutup" are not valid counterpoints.
You came in here only to pick a fight and I am telling you directly right now to STOP. If you don't you may not like the results.
#58
Originally posted by: Chumley
You said you wanted a debate. Change your mind?
You said you wanted a debate. Change your mind?
#59
Just try to remember that there ARE people in this world that will stand up when people start running their mouth. I certainly won't be the last you encounter. A forum is a place for group discussion, perhaps what you seek is a blog, a place where you can express your opinion all you want and no one will tell you any different.


