Itp 589's vs. Mudlites
#2
Itp 589's vs. Mudlites
We have a set of lite's on a 500 Sportsman and from what I can see it everything you need in a tire. Clear great in the snow, not sure about the mud yet it's still frozen. On the 700 we have a set of 589,'s what a massive tire. The lugs are huge and grab the mud and soupy trail very well.
Both are 6 ply so they will stop some of those punctures we all get from time to time. If I had a choice at this point, I would stick with the Lites. They are about 40 pounds lighter on c-series than 589's on steel rims. To a Sportsman that's huge.
Don't have anything to say bad about either, the 589 are serious mud and soft trail tires.
Both are 6 ply so they will stop some of those punctures we all get from time to time. If I had a choice at this point, I would stick with the Lites. They are about 40 pounds lighter on c-series than 589's on steel rims. To a Sportsman that's huge.
Don't have anything to say bad about either, the 589 are serious mud and soft trail tires.
#3
Itp 589's vs. Mudlites
I would think the 589 would be too much for a 400 sportsman if an older chain driven version. The 589 are a lot better tire in the rough spots than Mudlites. When you put tires on keep in mind of extra tension etc. I don't like my 589m/s on the hard packed areas because I find them too heavy and and when you lift the wheels off the ground they come back down too fast.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#9
#10
Itp 589's vs. Mudlites
I had the same 10" rear wheel delima. I could either get tires to fit, and not quite what I wanted, or go and buy two stock rear wheels from a 650, then get the tires I wanted, or do what I did in the end, and order up new rims and tires. I figure if your going to all the trouble, spend a few more bucks and get new rims. Now my old ones are spares and will be used on "gravel road running" days.