Drivetrain, Suspension & Tires Discussions on ATV drivetrain, suspension, and tires.

Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-05-2004 | 10:42 AM
mdd2121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

I need new tire on my Polaris 400 Sportsman. I would like to know what the comparison is of the Mudlites vs. the Itp 589's. I ride on hard packed and alot in the mud.
 
  #2  
Old 03-07-2004 | 10:16 PM
QMan500HO's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

We have a set of lite's on a 500 Sportsman and from what I can see it everything you need in a tire. Clear great in the snow, not sure about the mud yet it's still frozen. On the 700 we have a set of 589,'s what a massive tire. The lugs are huge and grab the mud and soupy trail very well.

Both are 6 ply so they will stop some of those punctures we all get from time to time. If I had a choice at this point, I would stick with the Lites. They are about 40 pounds lighter on c-series than 589's on steel rims. To a Sportsman that's huge.

Don't have anything to say bad about either, the 589 are serious mud and soft trail tires.

 
  #3  
Old 03-08-2004 | 06:45 PM
Kawi650's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

I would think the 589 would be too much for a 400 sportsman if an older chain driven version. The 589 are a lot better tire in the rough spots than Mudlites. When you put tires on keep in mind of extra tension etc. I don't like my 589m/s on the hard packed areas because I find them too heavy and and when you lift the wheels off the ground they come back down too fast.
 
  #4  
Old 03-08-2004 | 10:03 PM
mdd2121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

Thanks guys, it has been a real help. I think I will go with the Mudlites. It sounds like that will be the way to go for me.
 
  #5  
Old 03-11-2004 | 11:37 PM
CrekRunner's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

Good choice. IMO the only thing the 589s have on the ml is life-span.
 
  #6  
Old 03-12-2004 | 01:56 AM
Coyotechaser's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

Either the 589 or Mudlites would probably be good. What size tire did you want to mount? The Mudlites in a 25 or under will have a shorter tread depth. Also, have you considered the Mudrunners by Goodyear?
 
  #7  
Old 03-12-2004 | 10:08 AM
four4fish's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

these are the same 2 im looking for only in a 28"for 700 sportman what do you think is better and why
 
  #8  
Old 03-13-2004 | 01:13 AM
rsking45's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

If anyone is interested i have a set of goodyear rawhide grip.They have 105 miles on them . Ill give ya a good deal
Rich
 
  #9  
Old 03-13-2004 | 01:47 PM
mdd2121's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

I have 10" wheels on the rear, and the mudlites don't make a 26 for the 10" rim. I think the 27s would be to much for my 400, so I might have to go with the 26" 589s, unless I wanted to buy two 12" rear rims.
 
  #10  
Old 03-14-2004 | 02:42 PM
400PrarieXLT's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Default Itp 589's vs. Mudlites

I had the same 10" rear wheel delima. I could either get tires to fit, and not quite what I wanted, or go and buy two stock rear wheels from a 650, then get the tires I wanted, or do what I did in the end, and order up new rims and tires. I figure if your going to all the trouble, spend a few more bucks and get new rims. Now my old ones are spares and will be used on "gravel road running" days.
 


Quick Reply: Itp 589's vs. Mudlites



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.