Took my bike to my local shop to see what type of numbers my ESR 350 motor would put up on the dyno. The dyno software used was Win Pep. Here is what my bike did

Max Power = 52.3 Max Torque =36.9

Are these good Numbers for my motor? all input is greatly appreciated good or bad thanks.

 

can any one tell me if these are good or bad Numbers for this size or? thanks

 

52 is good for any quad but I was under the impression that a ESR 310 put out about 50-55.

I know you probably didn't run a baseline before the 350 kit, I ask because all dynos are a little different. If you have a dyno readout of a stock raptor or 400ex from that particular dyno then you would be able to tell if it is accurate or not. Most will agree that a stock 400ex will get about 28 and a raptor 34.

Alot of thing affect the reading, using knobbie tires for example with eat up a few HP.

 

the guy at the shop told me his dyno was a little on the low side but not by much. ESR has a graph of a dynoed 310 that read 61 horspower so ? im going to give them a call and see waht thay have to say thanks for your input.

 

sounds low to me but from what ive heard dyno read outs and ATV's arent always accurate.

 

also, are you just reading your max numbers? you could be making GOBS of torque where most 2 strokes dont make it. id rather have the choice to put 5hp down in the lower RPM's then adding 5hp on my max.

 

sounds alright. Sounds accurate.

 

Would anyone agree that when you as the buyer purchase the product and live in a higher elevation lets say 1200 ft verses 300 ft above sea level, that the companies claiming such large gains is a farse? I love seeing these companies claim massive gains and when it comes to the dyno it's not even close for us people in higher elevations. I have to say shame on THEM!!!! Less gas and less air gets you what? LESS HP!!!
Comments PLEASE!!!!