What is really going on in Michigan
#1041
Originally posted by: MUDDY4LIFE
I dont ever recall stating anything about a speed limit on ANY of the trails here in Michigan,so im not even sure where you come up with that accusation?
All ORV operators have the RESPONSABILITY to operate their Off Road Vehicles in a safe and responsable manner with regard to the safety of not only themselves, but ALL other operators riding on the trail. If you choose to use the trail system as your own personal mini race track, than you will have to deal with any of the shortcomings that may or may not become as a result of your inability to operate within the guidlines of the law.
I dont ever recall stating anything about a speed limit on ANY of the trails here in Michigan,so im not even sure where you come up with that accusation?
All ORV operators have the RESPONSABILITY to operate their Off Road Vehicles in a safe and responsable manner with regard to the safety of not only themselves, but ALL other operators riding on the trail. If you choose to use the trail system as your own personal mini race track, than you will have to deal with any of the shortcomings that may or may not become as a result of your inability to operate within the guidlines of the law.
#1044
Originally posted by: stunna65305
What happened to my sweet meth lab comment?
What happened to my sweet meth lab comment?
#1046
Originally posted by: MUDDY4LIFE
I just went to the minutes of the ORV Board metting that BB has highlighted and there is NOTHING in their that indicates that MY training program is subsidized by the TRIPLING of these ORV dollars,or that even ONE PENNY of my ORV safety program is subsidized by ORV sticker monies.Again---more HOT AIR!
I just went to the minutes of the ORV Board metting that BB has highlighted and there is NOTHING in their that indicates that MY training program is subsidized by the TRIPLING of these ORV dollars,or that even ONE PENNY of my ORV safety program is subsidized by ORV sticker monies.Again---more HOT AIR!
Or do you just expect public meeting minutes to reflect what subsidized dollars you will or won't accept.....at any given time?
The question is the incorrect formula itself, Muddy and always has been....why won't you speak word <U>one</U> to it?
$1 out of every $16 equals $3 out of every $25....yet all OTHER funding programs "will be allocated per the formula prescribed by the department".
Now is this formula the same one we've been going by for years....or is this some "new" formula only these trainers and the department evidently are privy to? (the former obviously assuming we are all idiots and the latter begging LEGAL questions concerning back-door-handshaked funding agreements that the public just might have to go to court over).
#1047
Originally posted by: stunna65305
Weak. I'm wonderin' what in the hell that guy was writing about earlier.
Weak. I'm wonderin' what in the hell that guy was writing about earlier.
#1048
Originally posted by: mywifesquad
"...Now the quad group wants them to step aside and let them take over...."
"...Now the quad group wants them to step aside and let them take over...."
This is not difficult to understand....yet the example here in Michigan obviously shows them asking for the separate and parallel trails....while still claiming that over 40% of 3,000 miles SHOULD NEVER BE TOUCHED AND BE FOREVER DECLARED THEIRS.
Great plan, in their mind...keep expanding the single track without losing a mile to our soon to be over-crowded and (by their own admission) WORN OUT present multi-use sytem (which they would just as soon 'get off' with this paralell single track rather than FIXING same **TOGETHER** with the rest of this 'peon' Michigan orv community. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-sad.gif[/img]
#1049
Originally posted by: mywifesquad
Apparantly its a huge problem for a few. Some wont sleep until 99.9% of the trails are multi use.
Originally posted by: ktmguy70The issue then, Is that most cyclist dont ENJOY wide, over used and muddy trails, and prefer single track. Nothing wrong with that. If you have 85% ATVS and 15% cycles, then theres nothing wrong with having a MAJORITY multi use trails, but also nothing wrong with a bit of single track.
"Me-only" single track is what you're after all right.....and more importantly that this mileage be <u>forever</u> shut out from the rest of this community who seeks to enjoy the same area or experience.
#1050
Originally posted by: blackballed
All the 4-wheeled community has ever asked these people is to <STRONG>quit</STRONG> acting like they are 'separate' from the rest of us and that they deserve single track BEYOND those which might PARALLEL existing systems.
SHOULD NEVER BE TOUCHED AND BE FOREVER DECLARED THEIRS.
All the 4-wheeled community has ever asked these people is to <STRONG>quit</STRONG> acting like they are 'separate' from the rest of us and that they deserve single track BEYOND those which might PARALLEL existing systems.
SHOULD NEVER BE TOUCHED AND BE FOREVER DECLARED THEIRS.
They will let anything that fits on it use it, wont they?






