Performance Mods and Project Quads Share and ask for information about modifying your ATV or building project quads.

4-stroke's suck!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 11:44 PM
  #191  
Just4Kicks's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,136
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

[quote]
Originally posted by: Doctorturbo
Come on people!!!!!!! Am I the only one that remembers this one??!!!!
What about the Kawasaki H2 750???


Aw yes, the Kawi triple...basically three 250cc singles combined to make one mean drag bike. My brother-in-law rebuilt one and I had the priledge to ride it, this was a good 10 years ago. That thing was scary fast!!! Not a good turning bike but try chasing it down the strip. Kudos to you for giving it mention.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 11:59 PM
  #192  
95sport400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

if the 2 stroke was sooooo great, y r all the street bikes 4 strokes
2-stroke street bikes were banned in the '70s because of emissions. No doubt you're not old enough to remember that or you'd also know why 2-strokes are better. But with all the new direct and semi-direct injected 2-strokes that meet all new emissions standards, I wouldn't be surprised if a few R&D departments aren't tinkering with 2-stroke bike projects.

Big boys need big toys.
So you're saying fat-asses need fat motors?
There's nothing wrong with the 4-strokes that are out there, but the 2-stroke is just plain better. More power, less weight. There is no argument.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 12:56 AM
  #193  
LTZlightning's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

YOU NO WHAT LT500ABUSE, you suck!!!!! whinner
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 02:12 AM
  #194  
CroBiker's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

i'm still waitin for somebody to tell me how 80hp from a 2-stroke is more than 80hp from a 4-stroke....
hey beech, i will line my bloated elephant 450R up against ur crankenstein any day. if for nothing more than a good view of it takin off the line, cuz after 40 feet, i'm gonna see nothin but roost. u 2-stroke guys don't scare me!!!! although, i'd like to see a 2-stroke launch off the top of a dune, that's somethin i have yet to see. is there a reason for this? or am i jus not seein something?
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #195  
moldycheese's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

Originally posted by: bansheeesmoker
There was a street bike with a motor very similar to a banshee. They dont make two stroke street bikes because of emissions and you cant find 2-stroke oil at every gas station. 2-stroke street bikes would be faster than 4-strokes if they were in production. A 1000 cc 2-stroke stock would probley put out about 220hp vs a 160hp 4-stroke. less maitinace and lighter. wait the same difference with dirt dikes. Its just on the street. 4 strokes is 2 strokes too many to make real power for displacement.
let me get this strait. a 2STROKE is more reliable than a 4STROKE EH? r u on crack. you can go years and years without touching the moto on a 4 stroke, but you have to re-build a stroke every year. you know absolutly nothing
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 10:23 AM
  #196  
madracing's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

in a 300 ft drag race 80hp on a 2stroke is faster than 80hp on a 4stroke because a 2stroke will rev faster and get to the 80hp faster than a 4stroke will.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 11:04 AM
  #197  
MikeSVOR's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

Originally posted by: moldycheeselet me get this strait. a 2STROKE is more reliable than a 4STROKE EH? r u on crack. you can go years and years without touching the moto on a 4 stroke, but you have to re-build a stroke every year. you know absolutly nothing



Oh come on now. 2 strokes are so reliable. Don't you know thats why they make all those 2 stroke generators that run forever?

And all those wonderful 2 strokes that get better fuel efficiency too.

NOT! lol.




[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #198  
95sport400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

[/quote]Originally posted by: bansheeesmoker
There was a street bike with a motor very similar to a banshee. They dont make two stroke street bikes because of emissions and you cant find 2-stroke oil at every gas station. 2-stroke street bikes would be faster than 4-strokes if they were in production. A 1000 cc 2-stroke stock would probley put out about 220hp vs a 160hp 4-stroke. less maitinace and lighter. wait the same difference with dirt dikes. Its just on the street. 4 strokes is 2 strokes too many to make real power for displacement.
let me get this strait. a 2STROKE is more reliable than a 4STROKE EH? r u on crack. you can go years and years without touching the moto on a 4 stroke, but you have to re-build a stroke every year. you know absolutly nothing
I've re-read the post that you quoted three times and I don't see the word reliable in there anywhere. Do you need to go to remedial reading class? As far as reliable 2-strokes, I just sold my '93 250 Trail Boss last year. Ran like new and the motor was never touched. I've had 3 2-stroke quads, 7 snowmobiles and still use my '75 Lawn Boy mower and not ONE of them ever needed motor work.

 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #199  
DaBeechMan's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

i still smile at all the ignorant people on here
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #200  
MikeSVOR's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default 4-stroke's suck!!

Originally posted by: DaBeechMan
i still smile at all the ignorant people on here
I'd say put the mirror down then cause your being just as ignorant.

Look dude, everybody knows what’s up with 2 stroke engines. Yes they put out more power per cubic inch and yes they're lighter. But your missing the point.
Most Prefer 4 strokes. The sales PROVE IT.
You’re stoned if you say 2 strokes need less maintenance than a 4 stroke. Check the sales stats for needed rings, jugs, bearings and reeds.
Speaking of ignorance, your 2 choke brethren are saying that their engines get better fuel efficiency than a 4 stroke. Yea, that's why you see so many 2 stroke engines in the automotive industry.

Don't think you’re better than everyone because you think nobody knows about port timing, compression ratios, and pop up pistons. It's old news.

I'm almost sure everyone here has owned a 2 stroke before and knows the power bands and such.
The masses just want something better and so they make their choice.

Get a clue, deal with it, and get a grip.




 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 AM.