I agree with ShadyRascal. And the Blaster is as fast as a 300ex or faster to begin with. It doesn't have reverse, but the 300 might as well not have it either. By the time you get it into reverse you could have picked the Blaster up and turned it around. And they're cheaper too! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

trailbreaker i totally agree withyou they are cheeper. my brother got a '93 for$1100

 

I wouldn't mine a blaster, but i still rather have the 300EX for some reason. So many choices out there.

 

I seen a bunch of cheap blasters also, i found a 2000 one fore 1495.00 + tax.

 

Go for a 300ex. An aircooled 2-stroke is a bad thing. You get what you pay for there. I bought an 300ex last year for my ex, and I love the thing. Dependable as hell, sounds like exactly what you need. A quad you wont have to worry about rebuilding in a year because you seized it up. They are more money, and yes a blaster might be just as fast or faster, but the 300 is just a better quad for all around use if you can afford it.

Oh, and whats the deal with everyone crying about the reverse? You get use to it and its cake.


[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

THE ONLY QUAD YOU NEED IS A Z400.
DONT LISTEN TO ANYONE ELSE

 

I see your sticking up for your quad. I might upgrade to one after I get better at riding a quad.

 

a 300ex is a nice bike for everthing around.

 

Yep, I think the 300ex is a good quad for me. Now i gotta find a good deal. I only have around 2100 to spend, soo i might need to wait till i get the money