Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

85 to 88 Suzuki LT230S Quadsport help.

Old Dec 14, 2010 | 02:42 PM
  #9671  
Twin_Stacks's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

whats the wet weight of a 230? even with your mods, your bike is as light as a dry 230 isnt it?
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 02:48 PM
  #9672  
JustRandy's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 0
Default

The early 230's weighed 315 dry I think. The latter ones weighed 330. I think I was 315 wet, but that was before the mods (250 engine, arms, swinger).
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 02:54 PM
  #9673  
Twin_Stacks's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

what all did you do before your upgrades to cut that much weight? chain? tire lugs? bumper, skids?
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #9674  
JustRandy's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 0
Default

As it sits right now, its 155lbs in front and 175lbs in back. 330lbs wet
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #9675  
JustRandy's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 0
Default

Who needs a bumper? scrapped it. Only 1lb or so, but still.

Never had rear brakes and dont really need them. Disk, caliper, fluid, hose, foot lever... what? 3-4lbs???

I shaved a pound or 2 off my tires.

Might have saved a pound on my chain, not sure. Saved something on my smaller sprockets. Doubt its a pound though.

That's about it. Heaviest thing is the tires. I'm tempted to shave lugs off the front too.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #9676  
Twin_Stacks's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

sounds like the added weight for the added hp is a good trade off. especially with the cuts youve made.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 04:21 PM
  #9677  
JustRandy's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 0
Default

The zilla only weighs 297. Hows that for a trade off? lol
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #9678  
Twin_Stacks's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

thats pure insanity. that must still hold the title for quad boss. 500cc at under 300? 2stroke? with all this new technology, how come there isnt a bike to top that?
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 04:34 PM
  #9679  
JustRandy's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 0
Default

EPA I guess. Not good to burn oil. And to equal the power of a 2-stroke, you'd need a 4-stroke roughly double the size. ie the raptor 700cc 4-stroke took the place of the banshee 350cc 2-stroke. There's no way you're going to get a 1000cc quad to weigh 300lbs... or a 750cc with turbo even
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #9680  
Twin_Stacks's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Default

epa... dont get me started about their bs. i suppose youre right but that still is funny to me that suzuki has one of the fastest bikes ever and its 20 years old.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.