Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 05-09-2005 | 11:32 PM
ACFreerider's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 1
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

Originally posted by: Andy Bassham
Put the warrior up against like a 97 Sportsman 400L 2-stroke and it might get interesting. Assuming the 97 Polaris was still actually running.
my friend has a 400l 2 stroke that my Warrior smokes. Its close til I hit about 3-4 gear then Im long gone. And it was just rebuilt last year (engine and tranny)

 
  #12  
Old 05-09-2005 | 11:46 PM
raptorider660's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

the 2 stroke 400 would kill the warrior
 
  #13  
Old 05-10-2005 | 04:09 AM
Andy Bassham's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,909
Likes: 0
From: Mountainburg, AR
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

Those old 400L Sportsmans and Explorers were pretty fast. They were pretty crappy too when it came to keeping them running. Chain drive and all didn't hurt much. I think it would be pretty close. I have a friend who has a 97 Sportsman that I rode a long time ago. I'd like to see how close he would come to my 660. And I'd put my Griz up against a Warrior any day. Last Warrior I rode was a 94 model and that was some 8 years ago at least, but I don't think it would hang with the 660, even with the weight difference. For some reason, I'm thinking the 400 2-stroke would give me a better run. But thats all seat of the pants guesswork, and over time I've probably forgotten how fast the Warrior actually was.
 
  #14  
Old 05-10-2005 | 10:23 PM
ACFreerider's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 1
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

Originally posted by: raptorider660
the 2 stroke 400 would kill the warrior
The scrambler 2x4 beats warriors not the Explorer or the 4x4 scrambler. You have to take in effect the extra weight and the drag from the front wheels. And Warriors kill the Explorer, haven't raced a 4x4 scrambler but they are the same basic thing as an Explorer

 
  #15  
Old 05-10-2005 | 10:32 PM
holeshotz8436's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

well first of all all the 4x4 scramblers have on command 4 wheel drive so they can be2x4's too but i know that both the scrambler 400 and 500 h.o. will deffinatly beat a warrior and i never rode a 400l or a explorer but it seemes that those 2 stroke 400's polaris has go pritty qucik
 
  #16  
Old 05-10-2005 | 11:43 PM
2phast4u's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?


my friend just got a 97 or 96 scramler 400 2-stroke 2x4 on command 4x4 he is completly stock w/ my momds below would i win he just got it and i want to race him but i dont want him talking **** thinking hes good on the easiest tranny in the world
 
  #17  
Old 05-11-2005 | 12:11 AM
holeshotz8436's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

Originally posted by: 2phast4u
which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?


my friend just got a 97 or 96 scramler 400 2-stroke 2x4 on command 4x4 he is completly stock w/ my momds below would i win he just got it and i want to race him but i dont want him talking **** thinking hes good on the easiest tranny in the world
i think it might be close but when your both topped out i thnik the scrambler would win cuz the top end on those things are up there
 
  #18  
Old 05-11-2005 | 12:22 AM
mahnster's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

My friend used to have a 400 Explorer. It did about 70 or so when it was running. He rebuilt it 3 times in less than a year, needless to say he does not have it anymore.
 
  #19  
Old 05-11-2005 | 12:31 AM
BIGCHEVROLET's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

Not to brag or talk up the utilities but the 400l polaris were and still are pretty quick machines. When mine had in the neighborhood of about 5000 miles on it. it would easily take a blaster( never ran with a warrior). It would also show a 600 grizzly whats up. Needless to say i sank it last spring right after the ice went off my lake. I pulled it to shore drained the airbox and carb fired it up and drove it up to my yard. let it sit and idle and the piston skirt ended up on my belly pan with part of the case as well. I had it bored ten over and put it back together with all stock parts. I recently went on a ride with some friends. My girlfriend was on my 700 twin and i am not as fast as it but i can keep up with a 660 pretty easily.

I am also run 27 inch vampires right now. It will burry the speedo past the 60 mark.
 
  #20  
Old 05-11-2005 | 03:47 AM
Andy Bassham's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,909
Likes: 0
From: Mountainburg, AR
Default which is faster between a stock warrior vs. a stock 400 sportsman?

With some engine work, you can make a 400 2-stroke Polaris of any flavor pretty much Dangerous.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Reactant
General Chat
15
03-30-2022 03:08 AM
Cole Hadden
Polaris
22
08-25-2020 12:11 AM
Ashley S
Yamaha
5
07-31-2015 10:46 AM
Reactant
General Chat
4
07-16-2015 11:29 PM
Dirtbikemike1
General Chat
1
07-11-2015 04:36 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.