Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

770 POWROLL KIT?

Old Apr 29, 2002 | 07:58 PM
  #101  
vraptor's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Default

herbdon
thanks for the good report on sparks, we've been needing just that kind of feedback, any idea on how much hp's you are getting? how about some of those CT motors, not hearing much from them, anyone?
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 10:51 PM
  #102  
sand45's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Default

Im all for a faster suv!!!!![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2002 | 11:27 PM
  #103  
raptor720's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Default


Tommm,

Concerning your post that we are all pissed because we bought or built 690's and 720's and that now somebody has a "good reliable" 770, consider the following:


The 771cc engine is made by using a 105mm piston, a 89mm stroke (+5mm stroke). Assuming that we are talking a stock 5.374 rod length, at 8500 rpm, your piston will travel 8211.9 feet per minute. I would be thinking of a Kevlar ball protector at about 6000 fpm, especially with a stock rod. You could install a long rod to help with some of the problems you will encounter but it is no miracle pill.
Remember, the 105 piston is forged and weighs more than stock. Even if you run a good rod, 8200fpm is a very nasty thought. I am not saying that it will not work -- I just think you should reconsider your statement that it is a good reliable engine.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 12:09 AM
  #104  
wshrdskin's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Default

Dang, finaly got through this thread. LOL. Some good info and some dribble. The dyno was denied the race was excepted. Do it and post. Please.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 12:18 AM
  #105  
ScoobyDFW's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
Default

does the Raptor have a good head/cylinder design in terms of sealing compression - 6 head bolts, etc?

I may be beyond what the ds650 head/cylinder design can seal with only 4 head bolts. If so then this is the limiting factor in terms of max power I can get out of the motor.

I'm going to add a second O-ring as a final attempt to keep the head sealed.

ds650 head

ds650 cylinder
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 12:58 AM
  #106  
smitty911's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Default

Raptor720,

In all honesty I am not all that familiar with the smaller motors. I know a little something about old Ford's FE 390's and 289's.

Some of your responses I stand corrected on. Yes, there are thousands of ways to build motors and I did not take into consideration all of the various components. I assumed that for the price that some builders will use off the shelf parts. That would exclude the custom pistons with custom ring locations, custom valves, etc., etc. Although I’m sure you don’t need me to validate what you know.

In regards to the carbs, I still disagree; if you are going with a standard FCR of course they will need to be jetted for the application that follows my thought of it's all in the tune of the motor.

Port work – As I stated I know a little about V-8 and it would depend on where you want the power, longer runners, cc of runners, etc, etc.. So the unless you are welding and relocating valves and spark plugs there is a finite amount that you can do to a stock head.

As a Final thought, most of these “KITS” cost about the same. It’s my understanding that most of the little custom mods will not be part of a kit build. If I added up the cost of off the shelf parts plus a little money for labor I could get close to what some of the builders will offer. I don’t know what the profit margins are of these parts but I’m sure that it cannot be absorbed into the custom cam grinds, custom piston, custom head work, custom crank grind, etc., etc. I’m basing this on my 400EX when I was thinking about building it. I talked to Sparks, Trinity, CT, and a couple of smaller guys.

If you offer all of the custom parts in a KIT for the consumer at a reasonable price, you’ll be busy.

When it’s time for the cannon to go nuclear, Harry at Trinity will be first on my short list.

Not trying to start a fight just trying to clarify a misunderstanding.

Smitty
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 01:27 AM
  #107  
14mins's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,549
Likes: 0
Default

Hebdon- Thanks for chiming in, with your thoughts. Was the phone ringing off the wall at Powroll today? I believe that POWROLL taught mickey dunlop everything he knows.

Herbdon- Do you have any plans to have your machine dyno'ed? If and when i ever find a dyno within a 100 miles of the house, i will be there. I don't claim to have the most hp. I just want it for my own imfo, to verify that i have it tuned right.

POWROLL kit seemed awful cheap. I have a feeling you only get a bag of parts. The DW article said minor headwork?
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 03:20 AM
  #108  
Kiwi_Craig's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 239
Likes: 1
Default

Rap 720, are you guys seeing 8500 rpm from your built engines ?. When I was at Powroll shop last year the whole idea of the 770 was mega grunt without having to rev it's nuts off. Relistically do you guys see more than 7000 - 7500 rpm ?

Kiwi
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 10:14 AM
  #109  
vraptor's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Default

I was somwhat suprized at the hp estimates on the poweroll 770 featured in the june dirtwheels (on the cover), estimated at 70 hp (though not dyno'd) is very similar to the output produced by 720 motors, however, the nitrous boost on that puppy estimated at an additional 24hp must make that awsome, they did a nice job of incorporating the notrous boost into the throttle (rather than switch) so it kicks in automatically at 3/4 throttle, what a rocket
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2002 | 11:03 AM
  #110  
raptor720's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Default

On that 771cc congif, 6000 fpm piston acceleration is achieved at a mere 6200rpm. Now I know the stock 84mm stroke exceeds the magic 6000fpm number but the cast piston does not weight nearly as much. King's 686 tends to fall off at 7500rpm. Recently, I tested a 720 with FCR's and a cam of my own spec that continued to make good power to 9100rpm. 7000-7200rpm seems to be the shift point for hill racing the Raptor. I think I would have trouble short shifting at a substantially lower rpm. Who knows? I am sure there is an application for the kit but I will always question the reliability issue -- especially if you add N20!

I still like the hp numbers and performance of motors with a substantially shorter stroke. The Cannondale for one is about 20mm less stroke and it will run in the same ball park. Ever thought of a Raptor with a 80mm stroke?????

Smitty,

No offense taken. From the FE and little V motor comment, I can see you are a fellow Ford man.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.