This pastor girl is an idiot why bother even responding to her!

 

I don't understand the point of any of this conversation, the damn thing has not been out long enough to develop any real presence anywhere.

but the videos and infomercial on this machine clearly show to have the utmost towing ability, the extended two seater versions (much like the arctic cat two seaters) offer more rack space and a longer wheel base for climbing steep grades with game or gear on the back preventing the front from lifting much better, and the independant rear suspension and ground clearance are clearly the best way to crawl over logs and rocks with minimum cargo shifting. Not to mention EFI for elevation changes.

if I was buying a quad for hunting, the extended length two seaters from BOMB and CAT are two machines I'd definitely put high on the list, for both the added space but more importantly the longer wheelbase!

but then there are duck hunters who have their quads sitting in 2 feet of water for hours and hours, all day even, with water up to the motor and tranny, and ALL experienced duck hunters in the cypress swamps where I've been will only swear by a manual shifting transmission to avoid issues with moisture in the belt drives.

if you don't like it then you don't it, that's fine, but its silly to base anything on a lack of knowledge.

 

Pastor you're either 10 years old or simply blindingly ignorant. You "don't see a lot of hunters, guides and true backwoodser's using them" because they've only been out in limited quantities for a few months and they've only sold a few thousand units the last I heard.

You seem to seem to have this weird predilection for stirring sh*t with baseless and ignorant "observations" and then fall all over your self apologizing to people when they call you on it. How about for once having a reasonable discussion about the bomber or a KQ or whatever. Something based on facts and not on your feelings or subjective BS like "I don't see a lot of hunters, guides and true backwoodser's using them blah blah blah therefore they must suck". I don't see many Bombardiers around here or Arctic cats for that matter. Is it because they aren't good ATVs? No, it is because they don't have an extensive dealer network in my area. Here it is all Hondas, Kawis, Yamis and to a lesser extent Suzuki and Polaris ATVs because they are sold locally. I have no problem is lively and spirited discussions on the actual technical aspects of an ATV such as IRS vs. solid axles singles vs. V-Twins or even the more subjective topics like ride and how certain machines perform in various conditions. I don't see any value in your brand of sh*t stirring. We won't even get into your aversion to legitimate criticisms of your machine. You don't even want people to discuss those kinds of things. It makes you feel bad about your purchase and it might have an effect on the resale value. You know, the ones where you shove your fingers in your ears and holler la-la-la-la-la when you don't want to hear actual facts. Most people don't want a rah rah cheerleader circle jerk when it comes to learning about their machines or when they're deciding on a 6-10 grand purchase. They want facts and educated observations not this idiotic and childish brand loyalty. It reminds me of the whole ignorant ford vs. chevy thing which has to be one of the silliest things in modern culture.

I know you're all ghey for your King Quad and believe there has never been and never will be anything better but use your d*mned head. Sheesh.

 

My rule. Never buy first year production of anything.
Many Hunters/guides/ whoeverelse follow the same rule.
who wants to be R&D outta their own pocket book. gotta have more money than me.

I would suspect 2nd year of production they will have significantly better sales as they should have more of the kinks worked out.