Unfounded Rumors
#91
Originally posted by: maddog56
That is taking a car engine and using it in a boat (which just about every inboard or I/O boat does). The situation is different for an outboard boat engine going into a car, and I cited the reasons why in my post. Boat engines don't need nearly as much hp or torque to get them moving, thats why most small recreational boats get by fine on 100 hp.
Originally posted by: OneFlyCowboy
Uhhhhhh Considering Honda puts the motor out of the civic in their boat motors I dunno why an evinrude smoker designed to push a boat wouldnt work in a car.
Uhhhhhh Considering Honda puts the motor out of the civic in their boat motors I dunno why an evinrude smoker designed to push a boat wouldnt work in a car.
#92
Speaking of diesel, I'm sure some people remember the diesel utility atv Polaris came out with in the 90's. It didn't seem to fare too well.
Now if we could get a scaled down Powerstroke or Cummins....
A twin cylinder turbo diesel, that would be different.
The Phantom....loves his F-350 Super Duty...
Now if we could get a scaled down Powerstroke or Cummins....
A twin cylinder turbo diesel, that would be different.
The Phantom....loves his F-350 Super Duty...
#93
Now you are talking about a 250 hp engine and a 1600 pound car (the lightest xfi was just over that weight dry). Most I/O boats use at least a GM/Mercruiser V6 or similar powerplant. This type of boat is what the civic engine you speak of would be used in. These engines are typically automotive engines redesigned for marine use. A two stroke outboard is a little different drive system (more tight angles) and have a different method of power delivery. I'm sure that you've ridden both a 2 stroke and 4 stroke quad and know the difference.
Think of the S2000, now imagine giving it the same powerband as a drag banshee. Ok, now drive it to work. This is basically what you are asking for, Have fun.
Could someone make it work, hey why not. Would it make a damn lick of sense to put a 3-5k dollar 2 stroke engine into a 1600 pound metro that originally retailed for 1300 dollars? Definately not. HP is hp, torque is torque, but the way the power is delivered and gets the machine moving is not the same and needs to be taken into account. If you want to press this issue or insult me further, go ahead. I'm done arguing about 2 stroke outboard motors in automobiles.
Think of the S2000, now imagine giving it the same powerband as a drag banshee. Ok, now drive it to work. This is basically what you are asking for, Have fun.
Could someone make it work, hey why not. Would it make a damn lick of sense to put a 3-5k dollar 2 stroke engine into a 1600 pound metro that originally retailed for 1300 dollars? Definately not. HP is hp, torque is torque, but the way the power is delivered and gets the machine moving is not the same and needs to be taken into account. If you want to press this issue or insult me further, go ahead. I'm done arguing about 2 stroke outboard motors in automobiles.
#94
Originally posted by: maddog56
Now you are talking about a 250 hp engine and a 1600 pound car (the lightest xfi was just over that weight dry). Most I/O boats use at least a GM/Mercruiser V6 or similar powerplant. This type of boat is what the civic engine you speak of would be used in. These engines are typically automotive engines redesigned for marine use. A two stroke outboard is a little different drive system (more tight angles) and have a different method of power delivery. I'm sure that you've ridden both a 2 stroke and 4 stroke quad and know the difference.
Think of the S2000, now imagine giving it the same powerband as a drag banshee. Ok, now drive it to work. This is basically what you are asking for, Have fun.
....
Now you are talking about a 250 hp engine and a 1600 pound car (the lightest xfi was just over that weight dry). Most I/O boats use at least a GM/Mercruiser V6 or similar powerplant. This type of boat is what the civic engine you speak of would be used in. These engines are typically automotive engines redesigned for marine use. A two stroke outboard is a little different drive system (more tight angles) and have a different method of power delivery. I'm sure that you've ridden both a 2 stroke and 4 stroke quad and know the difference.
Think of the S2000, now imagine giving it the same powerband as a drag banshee. Ok, now drive it to work. This is basically what you are asking for, Have fun.
....
but to the comparison of an s2000 with power of a drag banshee. SAWEEET i would drive it. I have driven a couple supras with power bands that of a banchee. when the second turbo hits HANG THE F@CK ON but anyway. i just thought it would be a fun experiiment obviously you feel its a dumb idea.
explore other technologies less maintainance better economy and fewer emissions. just tryin to appease the tree huggers.
#95
Originally posted by: maddog56
Could someone make it work, hey why not. Would it make a damn lick of sense to put a 3-5k dollar 2 stroke engine into a 1600 pound metro that originally retailed for 1300 dollars?
Could someone make it work, hey why not. Would it make a damn lick of sense to put a 3-5k dollar 2 stroke engine into a 1600 pound metro that originally retailed for 1300 dollars?
2-strokes are cheaper to produce than 4-strokes and produce better power per cc. Imagine a 2-stroke in something like the Mirano with that cvt tranny. It has potential from a performance point of view. BUT, the problem with 2-strokes is there is no dedicated lubrication system. They wear out quicker than 4-strokes. Not a big deal on recreational vehicles, but on a daily driver this would pose some problems in my mind.
Bumper to bumper 6 month 6,000 mile warranty? [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
#96
I sat down and read this forum and i must say..... Phantom you're the funniest guy u ever heard...
i feel you're one of the MaTrIx, the chosen one......lol
AirMan968........... I Don't Ride Fast, I Fly Low............
i feel you're one of the MaTrIx, the chosen one......lol
AirMan968........... I Don't Ride Fast, I Fly Low............
#97
Airman 968, my friend, it is good to make your aquaintence and appreciate your participation and hope your contributions continue in accentuating the conversation. I am the funniest person that I know of and a legend in my spare time, among other things. I try to be as truthful as possible in the information I pass along and hope that all that interact with me will learn somthing useful over time.
The Phantom.....semitemos sdraw setirw.....
The Phantom.....semitemos sdraw setirw.....
#99
alright mate keep it up.....
no offense but i didn't see any useful information in what u call "useful information".... but as long as you're having fun with the weird talk and this bs i have no problem with that
no offense but i didn't see any useful information in what u call "useful information".... but as long as you're having fun with the weird talk and this bs i have no problem with that
#100
Originally posted by: Raptorlegs
2-strokes are cheaper to produce than 4-strokes and produce better power per cc.
2-strokes are cheaper to produce than 4-strokes and produce better power per cc.


