Wonder why they didn't do a center of gravity test?

 

Wonder why they built their test to be specific to a situation where their's would do better instead of real world situations ?
Marketing.

 

Probably not but Bombardier makes jets and I've flown in them a few times. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

 

Interesting Polaris didn't do a comparison of what 90%+ people buy ATVs for. Riding tight trails. down steep inclines, and so on. Doubt very much if I ever use my KQ to see how much I can pull. Don't care how the tires are inflated, deflated, 2 wheel, 4 wheel or anything else. Have ridden both and my choice is the KQ. To each their own. That's why there are so many different choices. But if I decide to pull a sled of rocks around all day in a pasture I'll take a hard look at Polaris.

 

The sled all comes down to tires. The polaris cost $600 more msrp and if you look at there website the cast wheels only come on 2 colors, which I am sure there is an additional charge for those colors. Plus for $600 I can get cast wheels and better tires for a king and it will pull that trailer and go over that chunk of metal in 2wd. I would like to see a drag race in 2wd. Maybe a timed race through the trees on a twisty trail. I don't give a flying f*** if a polaris can beat me on a straight and flat surface that you don't need 4wd. Why don't we see which quads hurts less went you flip the f***er over and it's laying on top of you.

 

God I hate getting reply notifications to this thread. UNSUBSCRIBE!