Utility ATVs Discussions on utility ATVs.

full size utility opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #31  
v2rider's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,752
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

Originally posted by: RedGoblin
Originally posted by: v2rider
Originally posted by: RedGoblin
Originally posted by: cc1999
Originally posted by: CBF2
I have ridden them back to back (the 650 version), there is no comparison power wise. The extra few ccs won't close the gap.

Power: KQ
Suspension: Tie
Handling: Rincon
I would be willing to bet it will beat the ACV2 and the new KQ powered AC.
This is kind of a pointless comment because the Arctic Cats weigh so much more than everything else except Polaris.
Hard comment to prove as the v2 has a top speed greater than alot of quads, along with a mid range and low range power that is hard to beat. The bom will waste the V2, and the sp800 keeps up with it. The sp700 gets its butt kicked as my buddie already tried with his. This is all referring to Utility quads of course
If you are referring to the comment that I made, let me just ask you this: your V2 has the same engine as the old Kawasaki Prairie 650/ new Brute Force 650, right?
Probably, but it is geared different for 2006, 4:1
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #32  
RedGoblin's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

Ok, and you are saying it is faster than a Kawasaki Prairie 650, top to bottom, if both are stock?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:24 PM
  #33  
cc1999's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

Hard comment to prove as the v2 has a top speed greater than alot of quads, along with a mid range and low range power that is hard to beat. The bom will waste the V2, and the sp800 keeps up with it. The sp700 gets its butt kicked as my buddie already tried with his. This is all referring to Utility quads of course


I have to disagree with you on the comparison of the Sp800 vs the V2. There is no way the V2 is even going to come close to a sp800, and I would be more than surprised if it could beat a sp700. I spent about an hour on a v2 a year or so ago on a 10 acre dirt course with a long straight away, and left with a feeling of disapointment. The weight of the AC just killied that awsome 633 kawi twin. We raced our Sp800 against our 700 prarire/Twin peaks many, many, many times and the Twin peaks had all it wanted staying even with the sp800 on dirt or grass , the sp800 would actualy take the 700s at or about 45-50mph. There is no way as well tuned and modded as our 700 motors are that a machine lacking over 60cc and gaining about a 100 pounds is going to come close to running even with a sp800. Kawi has there 650twins tuned to start topping out in the low to mid 60s. There are allot of machines on the market that clear 70mph pretty easy, so I am not sure what the v2 can out run in that class. I like the features on the AC, I really do, I just think they need to get Kawi to sell them the 750 twin and get that v2 a little more HP to help deal with all that mass.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #34  
RedGoblin's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,484
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

Originally posted by: cc1999
I have to disagree with you on the comparison of the Sp800 vs the V2. There is no way the V2 is even going to come close to a sp800, and I would be more than surprised if it could beat a sp700. I spent about an hour on a v2 a year or so ago on a 10 acre dirt course with a long straight away, and left with a feeling of disapointment. The weight of the AC just killied that awsome 633 kawi twin. We raced our Sp800 against our 700 prarire/Twin peaks many, many, many times and the Twin peaks had all it wanted staying even with the sp800 on dirt or grass , the sp800 would actualy take the 700s at or about 45-50mph. There is no way as well tuned and modded as our 700 motors are that a machine lacking over 60cc and gaining about a 100 pounds is going to come close to running even with a sp800. Kawi has there 650twins tuned to start topping out in the low to mid 60s. There are allot of machines on the market that clear 70mph pretty easy, so I am not sure what the v2 can out run in that class. I like the features on the AC, I really do, I just think they need to get Kawi to sell them the 750 twin and get that v2 a little more HP to help deal with all that mass.
Something we agree on.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #35  
v2rider's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,752
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

No, but its not slower either. It probably has the same top speed, but cith the weight difference, changing the gear ratio gave it that edge
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #36  
ppope's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

It doesn't matter. It all comes down to what I said. We need to know what they want to do with the machine to give him an educated suggestion!
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #37  
v2rider's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,752
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

I just popped in because i saw that people were saying the cat being heavy, made it slow. When in fact being heavier than most, still keeps up with pretty much everything except the bom
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #38  
ppope's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

To be better at one thing you have to give up another, and so on. This makes some better for mudding, and some better for trails. You can't have it all.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #39  
v2rider's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,752
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

Originally posted by: cc1999
I have to disagree with you on the comparison of the Sp800 vs the V2. There is no way the V2 is even going to come close to a sp800, and I would be more than surprised if it could beat a sp700. I spent about an hour on a v2 a year or so ago on a 10 acre dirt course with a long straight away, and left with a feeling of disapointment. The weight of the AC just killied that awsome 633 kawi twin. We raced our Sp800 against our 700 prarire/Twin peaks many, many, many times and the Twin peaks had all it wanted staying even with the sp800 on dirt or grass , the sp800 would actualy take the 700s at or about 45-50mph. There is no way as well tuned and modded as our 700 motors are that a machine lacking over 60cc and gaining about a 100 pounds is going to come close to running even with a sp800. Kawi has there 650twins tuned to start topping out in the low to mid 60s. There are allot of machines on the market that clear 70mph pretty easy, so I am not sure what the v2 can out run in that class. I like the features on the AC, I really do, I just think they need to get Kawi to sell them the 750 twin and get that v2 a little more HP to help deal with all that mass.
My V2 tops out at 71mph
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #40  
ppope's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Default full size utility opinions

With all the accessories on my sp500, along with 26in tires, I still get nearly 60mph, and it prob weighs close to 900lbs without me. My grizz is about prob about 650-700lbs and only goes 65mph, but gets there alot quicker!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 PM.